twentyforty
Well-known member
@nuggetron said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505263) said:@lidcombe_magpie1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505250) said:@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505243) said:@lidcombe_magpie1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505241) said:@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505218) said:@lidcombe_magpie1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505213) said:@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505211) said:@bagnf05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505200) said:@jirskyr said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505175) said:@champ said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505098) said:As suggested before, all players should be on a points system. The more valuable a player is the higher the points.
I'll say this every time, and it's not a slight against you, but can anyone please show me a professional league of any sport globally that has a centrally-assigned points cap system in place? Can't work, won't work.
I see no reason why it couldn’t work, but it won’t happen because the people with the power ($) don’t want it.
I don't think it would work, too many variables.
I submitted a paper (upgrades to the current 100 point system) to the Sydney Rugby Union on this a few months ago. I agree it is terribly difficult and will never work unless it is administered appropriately. For fun I used the same method on the Tigers and the Roosters. Very interesting results
What would you base your point allocations on?
Did they play junior football for the club - reduces points
Did they play 1st grade for another club - increases points
Did they play their first grade game at another club - small points increase
Did they play State of Origin - increases points
Did they play for Australia or another tier 1 country - increases points
Did they play play for a 2nd Tier country - increases points
How many games/years have they played for the club - gradually reduces points
Did father or siblings play for the club - reduces points
A marquee allowance for 1-2 players - reduces points
Did they come from another senior sport (rugby/atletics etc) - no point increase
There were others but I can't remember off the top of my head
Thats a few starting ideas - I know there are many issues with this but it was just an attempt to find a workable solution
When I did the comparison between the Tigers and Rooster, the Roosters points were @ double of the Tigers
Points for internationals and origin are extremely problematic. There is also no mechanism in your allocation for differentiating skill level of players.
Yeah my solution for internationals and origin players would a gradual roll back of points. It would depend on how many games they played e.g. 1-5, or 5-10 etc and how long ago they were played. Eg if a player had not played at that level for 4 years no points would be added if it was 2 years it would be 50% point allocation if it was last year it would be 100% points allocation. Skill level of players is really dictated by what grades they have played and how many games also if they have played any rep games.
For me. I would drop TPAs. Allocate the salary to each team and have an additional fund which is given to the bottom 3 teams go help them get up the ladder. Similar to nfl getting the draft pick order.
Sure there may be some teams who tank but it's more fair than the TPA system we have now
Mmm? An incentive to run bottom of the ladder? Do you think the good teams will complain that this rule unfairly favours WT? ?