@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1506018) said:@sparci said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505997) said:@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505993) said:@sparci said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505990) said:@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505989) said:@thedaboss said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505982) said:@tonza said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505978) said:@camel2281 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505934) said:@bradexl said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1505665) said:Im continually confused how people believe that Simpkins' performance was better than Liddles this year. Liddle may not have been great but Simpkin was way out of his depth.
The team's best performance all year was against Souths with Simpkin playing. Not a coincidence
He was also the one that Burgess ran straight past to score the winning try. Yes great game.
U do realise we were a a man down cause talau was in the sinbin as well?
Also wasn't that his debut game as well?
It was. But if you think that’s an excuse, look at Cini.
Cini dropped 4 catches, you want to compare that scenario to a 19 year old thats defended in the middle for 70 odd minutes against the Souths pack and was caught lacking at the end of the game?
So it’s ok to write one 19 year old off, but not another? ?
Cini is 19?
Simpkin isn’t either if you want to be semantic. It’s ok to give up on the 21 year old but not the 20 year old?
Look champ if you want to keep faith in Cini, using some general common sense, considering what he's shown in your eyes so far in reserve grade and first grade, thats up to you. But I doubt you'd have many people following you on that path of faith. Cronulla have him on train and trial, im sure your keen to see how he goes. And yes, if you wanna be semantic, Simpkin was 19* during this season, not 20. cheers.