@bptiger-0 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1521634) said:
What rubbish , sheens won’t let brooks go fullstop
A number of people on here knock Brooks, but I had a look at the video showing the 'top tries' Wests put on last year and Brooks featured in many of these tries. His try assist stats from last year were decent. There is room for improvement in his game, particularly with last tackle options, but I personally hope we keep him. Letting him go without getting a player of equal value is just plain dumb.
Agreed. But what is his value really?
A bit.
His value is a good running game. Good handoff, can get over the line and can definately play.
His defense has improved but whole team needs to upgrade.
His value is not his weakness. His weakness is he does not think like a Half, does not organise or marshall the team, does not boss people around.
Move him or Fire him. Brooks nor Benji was ever a halfback.
You could sum up Wests Tigers very easily:
Still looking for a Halfback after Scott Prince left!
The interesting perspective on this is that when Scott Prince was here, a big chunk of the forum thought he should be moved to 5/8 because he wasn't a natural halfback. I remember people wanted a player by the name of Kieran Kerr to play 7. The year we won the comp this talk died down.
The whole "X is not a halfback" argument has happened ever since I can remember.
Brooks is a halfback, the question is, is he good enough?
Well, If Brooks is the halfback he needs to go.
Our defensive structure is haphazard and no one is organizing the team in defense. We often have overlaps and open spaces.
Our attack is moderately ok but our structure in attack is hopeless.
Now I want to put this radical idea that people can change positions. This actually worked for Chris Lawrence and IMHO could have worked for a fair number of players.
Ofcourse maybe we could get an organizing 5/8 in Hastings and Brooks keeps playing his 7 game. I honestly think that would work worse then moving Brooks to 5/8. Because you get 2 halfbacks then and with 2 halfbacks you get None.
Don’t worry about the numbers on their backs. Hastings and Brooks, and this is just my humble opinion based on hope and prayers, will be a revelation. If Brooks’s obvious talents get a little assistance from a reasonably capable footy head, he’ll show his potential, which is massive. Rip in now if you like but if I’m right, I want an apology by round 10.
Yep, agree with you regarding the numbers. Luke Keary was Rooster 6 and played on the left just as Brooks does. In fact, as good as Keary is/was his main problem was to crowd the Centre Mitchell & then Winger Topou by crabbing left whereas Brooks strength is his straight running dart to set up the outside backs. The problem is, we don't have a decent dummy half to get clean ball to the left sided Brooks. Hastings will provide an effective option simply cos of the unknown factor i.e. will he be the go to guy or will Brooks? Hopefully, the dummy halves have improved in the off season.