earl
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
- Messages
- 13,644
Yeah, until we clean up a lot
Of shit, I'm happy to not talk
About our defence either way.
The problem is we are so bad that some players might look a lot worse than they are.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah, until we clean up a lot
Of shit, I'm happy to not talk
About our defence either way.
I don't think it is so much that Adam cannot defend, he can, rather that he cannot read the plays coming at him on an edge, particularly when a half is involved. Centre, whilst also a tough position to defend from, doesn't rely quite so much on split second decisions and quick initial lateral movement.
As such, for mine he is more suited to play at centre or the distributor lock role, where in the middle, he will not be isolated by the opposition so often.
If that was to be his future spot, I would look at swapping him and Hastings around occasionally, particularly in defence, to give Jackson a bit of a rest from the high workload there.
Either way, with November 1st fast approaching and all of or currently contracted potential halves only signed until next year, our WT will likely have to make such decisions very soon if not already made.
Remember too that good second rowers can play minder for the 5/8, which we don't have at present. When the pack improves, everybody will look better.
The problem is we are so bad that some players might look a lot worse than they are.
The Storm are pretty unique though. I wish we had a NAS of our own.Sounds good. The problem is we are playing Hastings at 13 and he isn't a big body. I've seen the Storm with Nelson at 13.
Gee still makes him a what 775k player , sweet deal for Brooks if true.IMO Brooks will be here next year if he wants it . I think he is being offered a 3 year deal 2023 -2025 for $2.3:mill .However seeing his old contract has $1.1 mill backended for 2023 only . I think Sheens wants him to forfeit that in lieu of the new contract .I effect he is getting an additional $1.2 mill for 2 extra years
Brooks may not accept this and if not Sheens will either have to improve the 3 year deal or offload him and we will still pay about half his contract for next year only . Sheens likes Brooks and wants him to accept the 3 year deal
🤣🤣🤣
Which one got his stomach pumped? Cuz would be that one haha
I can’t answer. I can’t answer that
Him though?A halves coach - That would be a treat...
He isn't near as busy in the off season though, which is hopefully when we would need him the most.Him though?
Busy man.....
Wouldn't be investing too much time in the lads due to other commitments you'd think.
He seems a smart mind when it comes to football, wouldn't hurt... don't think it'd be a full time thing. Maybe a few consultations here and there.Demps i was surprised when the name got mentioned but not sure if they where telling porkies but they seemed sincere .
There's only one that could be considered better - And he's stuck at the Knights.
Dunno man, if it's through the season might be an issue...
But he was working with Cronk way back when - That's in Melbourne mid 2000's.... You'd reckon he was a busy back then.
I know that a few of them come to him at home as well?
Heard Brandy (Has a similar job) His comments were like "Why would you ever leave, You work 3.5 days a week for 6 months a year"