@pj said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1379153) said:
So sharks get hynes and good chance of finucane, dogs get ado Carr and Burton and we're looking at Dwz. ?
We must be the basket case of basket cases
Canterbury have tried to buy a team and are finding out the hard way that that's not how it works. We learnt that lesson a few years ago with Cleary. Addo-Carr and Burton are fine acquisitions but I much prefer the way we are going about recruitment.
Just because Ivan made some poor recruitment decisions doesn't mean you shouldn't target excellent, established players. Burton and Addo-Carr are excellent signings. They're getting rid of Dallin because they have signed players who are an upgrade on him. The fact Dallin would walk right into our team is an indictment of our backline recruitment.
Spot on.
Josh and Burton are great buys and would walk into our team. So would hynes.
We should be after finucane big time and if we miss out, questions should be asked. Especially if we are looking at dwz
You don't judge recruitment on players that you miss.
Why not?
You rate everything else to be a success on both ends of the equation, why not recruitment? If we are failing to sign players , we are doing something wrong.
You judge it on the players you do recruit as that is the only thing that is 100% in your control. Missing out on a player in not 100% in any clubs control.
I'm halfway there with you on this one but it sounds like something a bad recruiter would say. Has someone at the club said this?
No not at all, just my opinion. For example, if Munster came on the market and we attempted to sign him but missed out. I can accept that.
What I wouldn't be able to accept is if we turned around and signed Matt Moylan after that. I would want us to make a smart recruitment decision after that.
If Munster came on the market and we were chasing his signature, regardless of other teams, and we missed out, that is an absolute failure
Or you can count it as a failure, sure, but then it's a failure against 15 teams every time. Every signature made is a failure by the other 15 teams to land that same signature. Then keep adding up every club who didn't sign a specific player, you end up favouring the clubs that sign and lose high volumes of players.
Or your alternative is to then try and qualify each non-signing - how hard did we try (you will never know), did we try at all (you will never know for sure), how much did we offer under what terms (you won't know) etc.
I think the point @cochise is making is that because nobody here knows the true terms of potential negotiation with any player, you can't realistically judge the success or failure of any non-signing, because you don't really truly know what happened. It could be club culture, it could be reputation, it could be money, it could be personality clash, it could be the club changed their mind, it could be salary cap, injuries, better players came on market, change of mind etc. etc. etc.