Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

[LeichhardtTiger]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.

I'd enter the race purely to make them pay more put their cap out of whack even further.

Pretty Sure our pack owned the Dragons pack twice this year.

Perhaps you should re read my comment

Perhaps you should consider the consequences of proposing a dodgy player negotiation. But, sorry, I quoted from the wrong post. The comment was to highlight to the previous poster that we don't need him at any price. But setting the Dogs up and pulling out will just make us, as a Club, seem even less trustworthy for future recruits.

 

[the_third]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.

hahaha classic.

he's available isn't he, Scott, Norman, pangai, Vaughan, naden.

what could go wrong

 

[Jedi_Tiger]

can Milford play centre perhaps

 

[westy81]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.


hahaha classic.

he's available isn't he, Scott, Norman, pangai, Vaughan, naden.

what could go wrong

They’ll finish above us next year

 

[HabboTiger]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.


hahaha classic.

he's available isn't he, Scott, Norman, pangai, Vaughan, naden.

what could go wrong

They’ll finish above us next year

50/50

 

[Goanna57]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.


hahaha classic.

he's available isn't he, Scott, Norman, pangai, Vaughan, naden.

what could go wrong

They’ll finish above us next year

50/50

No 50/50 about it if we basically have the same squad

 

[HabboTiger]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.


hahaha classic.

he's available isn't he, Scott, Norman, pangai, Vaughan, naden.

what could go wrong

They’ll finish above us next year

50/50

No 50/50 about it if we basically have the same squad

I think we will place higher than the dogs

 

[avocadoontoast]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.


hahaha classic.

he's available isn't he, Scott, Norman, pangai, Vaughan, naden.

what could go wrong

They’ll finish above us next year

50/50

No 50/50 about it if we basically have the same squad

I think we will place higher than the dogs

As the roster stand now I can’t see how that could happen.

 

[yeahcaz]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.


hahaha classic.

he's available isn't he, Scott, Norman, pangai, Vaughan, naden.

what could go wrong

They’ll finish above us next year

50/50

No 50/50 about it if we basically have the same squad

I think we will place higher than the dogs

No way you can say that with a straight face

 

[yeahcaz]

Have we re signed Mikaele yet

 

[clontarfkid]

can Milford play centre perhaps

Too small...too lazy

 

[jirskyr]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.


hahaha classic.

he's available isn't he, Scott, Norman, pangai, Vaughan, naden.

what could go wrong

They’ll finish above us next year

50/50

No 50/50 about it if we basically have the same squad

I think we will place higher than the dogs

No way you can say that with a straight face

Just so we are all clear a prediction is not a fact, so nobody is right yet. I agree with annandale I think Dogs haven't recruited astutely. They will improve but they could hardly do worse. I think Barrett is a poor coach - lifetime win record 34%.

 

[the_third]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.

what could go wrong? haha

 

[HabboTiger]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.


hahaha classic.

he's available isn't he, Scott, Norman, pangai, Vaughan, naden.

what could go wrong

They’ll finish above us next year

50/50

No 50/50 about it if we basically have the same squad

I think we will place higher than the dogs

No way you can say that with a straight face

Just so we are all clear a prediction is not a fact, so nobody is right yet. I agree with annandale I think Dogs haven't recruited astutely. They will improve but they could hardly do worse. I think Barrett is a poor coach - lifetime win record 34%.

Exactly. Also heavily recruited roster turn overs rarely click straight away. I see them improving to 10 ish

 

[tigerap]

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-07-21/nrl-trade-swap-brooks-mbye-hodgson-wighton-tigers-raiders/100310488

**Tigers swap offer to Raiders *never happened* but NRL executives get creative as deadline looms**

League officials have denied an offer from the Tigers to swap halfback Luke Brooks and utility Moses Mbye for Canberra's Josh Hodgson and Origin five-eighth Jack Wighton was ever made.

--------------------------------------------------

Not sure who the "league officials" are?

Can we send this link to our greatest club member James Hooper!

 

[GarryOwen]

People seem to be acting like we're on the eve of the 2022 season. There's an eternity before the season starts - there will be loads of player movement across the league before then.

 

[TonyTiger]

can Milford play centre perhaps

Tooooooo sloooooooow

 

[TigerWest]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.


hahaha classic.

he's available isn't he, Scott, Norman, pangai, Vaughan, naden.

what could go wrong

They’ll finish above us next year

50/50

No 50/50 about it if we basically have the same squad

I think we will place higher than the dogs

No way you can say that with a straight face

Just so we are all clear a prediction is not a fact, so nobody is right yet. I agree with annandale I think Dogs haven't recruited astutely. They will improve but they could hardly do worse. I think Barrett is a poor coach - lifetime win record 34%.

I said earlier, Barrett will be lucky to see out next season, with Gould telling him where he is going wrong, every minute of the day.

 

[Tcat]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.


hahaha classic.

he's available isn't he, Scott, Norman, pangai, Vaughan, naden.

what could go wrong

They’ll finish above us next year

50/50

No 50/50 about it if we basically have the same squad

I think we will place higher than the dogs

No way you can say that with a straight face

Just so we are all clear a prediction is not a fact, so nobody is right yet. I agree with annandale I think Dogs haven't recruited astutely. They will improve but they could hardly do worse. I think Barrett is a poor coach - lifetime win record 34%.

I said earlier, Barrett will be lucky to see out next season, with Gould telling him where he is going wrong, every minute of the day.

Cleary wanting him gone asap. If Barrett were to go, I could see a Morris type character going there so Phil could pull all the strings with Morris as the face.

 

[happy_tiger]

Question - With Paul Vaughn looking like joining the Dogs on the cheap side do we look at entering the party??
He would come cheap and it would not be long term but he would come into the 13 straight up. If we don't get him at least it will make dogs pay more

I would have no problems getting him for 400-450k for 2 years and not for his leadership but more for his work he does on the field.


panga and Vaughan sounds like a culture disaster. just sign Norman and the dogs are set

Curtis Scott could be useful as well.


hahaha classic.

he's available isn't he, Scott, Norman, pangai, Vaughan, naden.

what could go wrong

They’ll finish above us next year

50/50

No 50/50 about it if we basically have the same squad

I think we will place higher than the dogs

No way you can say that with a straight face

Just so we are all clear a prediction is not a fact, so nobody is right yet. I agree with annandale I think Dogs haven't recruited astutely. They will improve but they could hardly do worse. I think Barrett is a poor coach - lifetime win record 34%.

I said earlier, Barrett will be lucky to see out next season, with Gould telling him where he is going wrong, every minute of the day.

Cleary wanting him gone asap. If Barrett were to go, I could see a Morris type character going there so Phil could pull all the strings with Morris as the face.

What about Griffin lol