Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

@aceshigh said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1464135) said:
Wow Brooksy cannot run a footy team , he can’t set up tries his kicking game is rubbish his defence is below par

It's been this way for years.
Same comments were made in the 2017 thread we bumped the other day.

Still got a bunch of people making excuses for him though.

Some hard calls need to be made on this guys future. He isn't the man for us.
 
@demps said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1464151) said:
@aceshigh said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1464135) said:
Wow Brooksy cannot run a footy team , he can’t set up tries his kicking game is rubbish his defence is below par

It's been this way for years.
Same comments were made in the 2017 thread we bumped the other day.

Still got a bunch of people making excuses for him though.

Some hard calls need to be made on this guys future. He isn't the man for us.

He needs to go along with quite a few more..
Unfortunately we will not be able to offload him as other teams watch our games and know this.. Stuck with him for a few more years yet.
 
I reckon we're being too harsh on Brooks. We definitely need to give him another 2-3 years so he can make the team his own!
 
@finnzo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1464279) said:
Has any 1 els just become completely numb to losses like This?

No this hurts still. Maybe the feeling is exaggerated with the injuries we had to the young blokes….
 
@tiger_claws said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1462527) said:
No sour grapes here. My son was a solid 20s player but was never going to cut it at NRL level. I witnessed Hartigan implement a program for 12,13 and 14 year olds. It was thrown out 18 months later and Brian Gray returned to junior management to undo the mess. I then saw first hand Hartigan coach. The training standards he and his assistant Anasta had wouldn’t cut it in park footy. Lucky the Roosters had Tony Barnes and Artie Kitinas to fix up the rubbish Hartigan had coached into players. Also for the record Latrell wasn’t signed by Hartigan his manager at the time Steve Deacon dealt directly with Peter O’Sullivan as did my son. I am also pretty sure Manu was signed by O’Sullivan after a recommendation from Craig Walker (kiwi and roosters welfare man at the time. My original post said clearly he shouldn’t be near our top squad and I stand by that on facts and my own observations. He should only be involved in a junior recruitment/scout level. He is in way over his head. Nice bloke but not a GM.

So as an example of why he is not a good GM, you explained that he is not a good coach?

He isnt coaching here.
 
@demps said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1463376) said:
Time to initiate a clean out.

Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep
.....The sound of a Port Headland-style dump truck reversing into Stefano’s driveway loaded with cash ... our only enticement option to keep this guy under our umbrella.
What about that chase on Nick Meaney down the sideline - better than Scott Satler’s efffort because Meaney can scoot!
 
Hartigan presided over 2 separate junior programs at Roosters and both got flicked and changed after 18 months. The last straw for Roosters was give him a coaching job and I seen first hand it failed. Tigers rejected Matt Cameron for that role and rightly so but Mat has far more runs on the board than Hartigan. Lee and Politis are extremely tight and maybe just maybe Hartigan got his nose in the door that way.
 
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1462741) said:
@cqtiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1462738) said:
I couldn’t care less about someone’s opinion or observation on Hartigan especially when relatives are involved and at another club.

It can’t be denied that he has been responsible for signing many talented young players into our system. Surely no-one can dispute that.

What Hartigan is being blamed for is not getting top NRL signatures. When he came here it was publicised that he would get our salary cap in order and not get us caught paying way overs again. Surely that is another tick for him?

We will struggle to sign marquee players because the other successful clubs will bid high for them anyway and until we are making finals ala winning, they won’t come here.

We are on the right track with the good young players we have we just need to find the right NRL experience to put with them at the right price. It hasn’t worked with Tamou, BJ, JTJ and others but they aren’t on long term deals so we keep trying.

My biggest worry is do we gave the right coach for this scenario? Personally, I don’t think Madge is that guy.

Excellent post mate.

Sorry mate, I know you're a fan of AH but I'm yet to see what he brings to the club. We've signed a few good juniors on his watch but not one quality NRL player and that's what we need to be competitive and attract better players. He won't pay overs but we get no-one because he won't pay overs. We need players of the quality of TPJ and better. If media reports were correct he offered Finucane a two year contract. What was the point of that when Finucane wanted four and might have settled for three. Why offer a guy a contract you know he won't accept. Our efforts to sign quality NRL players have been an embarrassment and that's all down to AH.
 
@coivtny said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1464458) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1462741) said:
@cqtiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1462738) said:
I couldn’t care less about someone’s opinion or observation on Hartigan especially when relatives are involved and at another club.

It can’t be denied that he has been responsible for signing many talented young players into our system. Surely no-one can dispute that.

What Hartigan is being blamed for is not getting top NRL signatures. When he came here it was publicised that he would get our salary cap in order and not get us caught paying way overs again. Surely that is another tick for him?

We will struggle to sign marquee players because the other successful clubs will bid high for them anyway and until we are making finals ala winning, they won’t come here.

We are on the right track with the good young players we have we just need to find the right NRL experience to put with them at the right price. It hasn’t worked with Tamou, BJ, JTJ and others but they aren’t on long term deals so we keep trying.

My biggest worry is do we gave the right coach for this scenario? Personally, I don’t think Madge is that guy.

Excellent post mate.

Sorry mate, I know you're a fan of AH but I'm yet to see what he brings to the club. We've signed a few good juniors on his watch but not one quality NRL player and that's what we need to be competitive and attract better players. He won't pay overs but we get no-one because he won't pay overs. We need players of the quality of TPJ and better. If media reports were correct he offered Finucane a two year contract. What was the point of that when Finucane wanted four and might have settled for three. Why offer a guy a contract you know he won't accept. Our efforts to sign quality NRL players have been an embarrassment and that's all down to AH.

Yes, Finucane wanted 4 years, we offered 2 years - good move by the Tigers, he has been bog average since signing with the Sharks - told old for a 4 year gig, would have been another Packer job.
 
@tiger_claws said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1462527) said:
No sour grapes here. My son was a solid 20s player but was never going to cut it at NRL level. I witnessed Hartigan implement a program for 12,13 and 14 year olds. It was thrown out 18 months later and Brian Gray returned to junior management to undo the mess. I then saw first hand Hartigan coach. The training standards he and his assistant Anasta had wouldn’t cut it in park footy. Lucky the Roosters had Tony Barnes and Artie Kitinas to fix up the rubbish Hartigan had coached into players. Also for the record Latrell wasn’t signed by Hartigan his manager at the time Steve Deacon dealt directly with Peter O’Sullivan as did my son. I am also pretty sure Manu was signed by O’Sullivan after a recommendation from Craig Walker (kiwi and roosters welfare man at the time. My original post said clearly he shouldn’t be near our top squad and I stand by that on facts and my own observations. He should only be involved in a junior recruitment/scout level. He is in way over his head. Nice bloke but not a GM.

correct with Peter O'Sullivan signed Latrell
 
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1464399) said:
@tiger_claws said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1462527) said:
No sour grapes here. My son was a solid 20s player but was never going to cut it at NRL level. I witnessed Hartigan implement a program for 12,13 and 14 year olds. It was thrown out 18 months later and Brian Gray returned to junior management to undo the mess. I then saw first hand Hartigan coach. The training standards he and his assistant Anasta had wouldn’t cut it in park footy. Lucky the Roosters had Tony Barnes and Artie Kitinas to fix up the rubbish Hartigan had coached into players. Also for the record Latrell wasn’t signed by Hartigan his manager at the time Steve Deacon dealt directly with Peter O’Sullivan as did my son. I am also pretty sure Manu was signed by O’Sullivan after a recommendation from Craig Walker (kiwi and roosters welfare man at the time. My original post said clearly he shouldn’t be near our top squad and I stand by that on facts and my own observations. He should only be involved in a junior recruitment/scout level. He is in way over his head. Nice bloke but not a GM.

So as an example of why he is not a good GM, you explained that he is not a good coach?

He isnt coaching here.

We saw a pretty darn good example at 4pm today. No surprise the Roosters punted him.
 
I have supported Madge all year but putting Cini at fullback was absurd and then replacing him with Nofoaluma was insanity. I thought Amone would be good for us but he isn’t up to it. Please tell me it’s true Brooks for Tapine.. Hastings is far superior to Brooks
 
With all the money available under the cap we should sign anyone available for next on 1-2 year deals and then release most of the players that turned up today pay them to play elsewhere
 
@tonytiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1464489) said:
@coivtny said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1464458) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1462741) said:
@cqtiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1462738) said:
I couldn’t care less about someone’s opinion or observation on Hartigan especially when relatives are involved and at another club.

It can’t be denied that he has been responsible for signing many talented young players into our system. Surely no-one can dispute that.

What Hartigan is being blamed for is not getting top NRL signatures. When he came here it was publicised that he would get our salary cap in order and not get us caught paying way overs again. Surely that is another tick for him?

We will struggle to sign marquee players because the other successful clubs will bid high for them anyway and until we are making finals ala winning, they won’t come here.

We are on the right track with the good young players we have we just need to find the right NRL experience to put with them at the right price. It hasn’t worked with Tamou, BJ, JTJ and others but they aren’t on long term deals so we keep trying.

My biggest worry is do we gave the right coach for this scenario? Personally, I don’t think Madge is that guy.

Excellent post mate.

Sorry mate, I know you're a fan of AH but I'm yet to see what he brings to the club. We've signed a few good juniors on his watch but not one quality NRL player and that's what we need to be competitive and attract better players. He won't pay overs but we get no-one because he won't pay overs. We need players of the quality of TPJ and better. If media reports were correct he offered Finucane a two year contract. What was the point of that when Finucane wanted four and might have settled for three. Why offer a guy a contract you know he won't accept. Our efforts to sign quality NRL players have been an embarrassment and that's all down to AH.

Yes, Finucane wanted 4 years, we offered 2 years - good move by the Tigers, he has been bog average since signing with the Sharks - told old for a 4 year gig, would have been another Packer job.

With respect, that makes no sense. If we offered him a contract, we wanted him. If we thought he wasn't up to it we shouldn't have offered him anything.
 
@coivtny said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1464580) said:
@tonytiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1464489) said:
@coivtny said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1464458) said:
@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1462741) said:
@cqtiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1462738) said:
I couldn’t care less about someone’s opinion or observation on Hartigan especially when relatives are involved and at another club.

It can’t be denied that he has been responsible for signing many talented young players into our system. Surely no-one can dispute that.

What Hartigan is being blamed for is not getting top NRL signatures. When he came here it was publicised that he would get our salary cap in order and not get us caught paying way overs again. Surely that is another tick for him?

We will struggle to sign marquee players because the other successful clubs will bid high for them anyway and until we are making finals ala winning, they won’t come here.

We are on the right track with the good young players we have we just need to find the right NRL experience to put with them at the right price. It hasn’t worked with Tamou, BJ, JTJ and others but they aren’t on long term deals so we keep trying.

My biggest worry is do we gave the right coach for this scenario? Personally, I don’t think Madge is that guy.

Excellent post mate.

Sorry mate, I know you're a fan of AH but I'm yet to see what he brings to the club. We've signed a few good juniors on his watch but not one quality NRL player and that's what we need to be competitive and attract better players. He won't pay overs but we get no-one because he won't pay overs. We need players of the quality of TPJ and better. If media reports were correct he offered Finucane a two year contract. What was the point of that when Finucane wanted four and might have settled for three. Why offer a guy a contract you know he won't accept. Our efforts to sign quality NRL players have been an embarrassment and that's all down to AH.

Yes, Finucane wanted 4 years, we offered 2 years - good move by the Tigers, he has been bog average since signing with the Sharks - told old for a 4 year gig, would have been another Packer job.

With respect, that makes no sense. If we offered him a contract, we wanted him. If we thought he wasn't up to it we shouldn't have offered him anything.

How doesn’t it make sense. We wanted him, but only saw his worth for 2 years as opposed to 4.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top