Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

[frullens]

Two spots left if Hodgson signs... that's a little concerning.

We lack a backup fullback, backup wingers, a centre, a second rower and even another prop

That seems like a lot more than 2

That assumes we don't do any swap deals.
It's been suggested on here liddle to doggies for thompson
And long been suggested in media garner to manly
Then also need to see if brooks stays on for full term of his contract

 

[yeahcaz]

Two spots left if Hodgson signs... that's a little concerning.

We lack a backup fullback, backup wingers, a centre, a second rower and even another prop

That seems like a lot more than 2

That assumes we don't do any swap deals.
It's been suggested on here liddle to doggies for thompson
And long been suggested in media garner to manly
Then also need to see if brooks stays on for full term of his contract

I highly doubt Brooks gets moved on this season. Madge seems to love him while Brooks doesn’t. Plus the club won’t pay him for to play somewhere else for 2 years

 

[GNR4LIFE]

I think it will be Simpkin on the move in 2023

Lol no it won’t. He has a long term contract, Liddle doesn’t.

3 years is long term, but 2 isn’t?

Are you just realising 3 is a bigger number than 2 ?

Don’t deflect. Are you trying to say 2 years isn’t long term?

I’m not deflecting. No 2 years isn’t long term. If I sign someone to a 2 year deal around this time starting season 2022, he can sign with a rival club a year later. For a club that has no stability like us, 3 years is a long term deal.

You are reading too much into it.

That’s rich. Go fishing somewhere else

You do realise that 2 year contracts are standard across the competition right? And it doesn’t mean the players who sign them aren’t valued by their clubs?

 

[Tiger_Fanatic3]

I've been a big fan of Liddle since his debut but he really hasn't shown the service or speed that he had when he was younger before his billion injuries. I suspect they'll develop Simpkin under Hodgson and move lids on. It's a real shame, because Liddle promised so much, but he just hasn't delivered this year.

 

[yeahcaz]

I think it will be Simpkin on the move in 2023

Lol no it won’t. He has a long term contract, Liddle doesn’t.

3 years is long term, but 2 isn’t?

Are you just realising 3 is a bigger number than 2 ?

Don’t deflect. Are you trying to say 2 years isn’t long term?

I’m not deflecting. No 2 years isn’t long term. If I sign someone to a 2 year deal around this time starting season 2022, he can sign with a rival club a year later. For a club that has no stability like us, 3 years is a long term deal.

You are reading too much into it.

That’s rich. Go fishing somewhere else

You do realise that 2 year contracts are standard across the competition right? And it doesn’t mean the players who sign them aren’t valued by their clubs?

That doesn’t change the fact it’s a short term contract

 

[Tiger_Fanatic3]

Two spots left if Hodgson signs... that's a little concerning.

We lack a backup fullback, backup wingers, a centre, a second rower and even another prop

That seems like a lot more than 2

No, let's sign Matt Ballin instead ..

 

[GNR4LIFE]

I think it will be Simpkin on the move in 2023

Lol no it won’t. He has a long term contract, Liddle doesn’t.

3 years is long term, but 2 isn’t?

Are you just realising 3 is a bigger number than 2 ?

Don’t deflect. Are you trying to say 2 years isn’t long term?

I’m not deflecting. No 2 years isn’t long term. If I sign someone to a 2 year deal around this time starting season 2022, he can sign with a rival club a year later. For a club that has no stability like us, 3 years is a long term deal.

You are reading too much into it.

That’s rich. Go fishing somewhere else

You do realise that 2 year contracts are standard across the competition right? And it doesn’t mean the players who sign them aren’t valued by their clubs?

That doesn’t change the fact it’s a short term contract

Can’t agree.

 

[yeahcaz]

I think it will be Simpkin on the move in 2023

Lol no it won’t. He has a long term contract, Liddle doesn’t.

3 years is long term, but 2 isn’t?

Are you just realising 3 is a bigger number than 2 ?

Don’t deflect. Are you trying to say 2 years isn’t long term?

I’m not deflecting. No 2 years isn’t long term. If I sign someone to a 2 year deal around this time starting season 2022, he can sign with a rival club a year later. For a club that has no stability like us, 3 years is a long term deal.

You are reading too much into it.

That’s rich. Go fishing somewhere else

You do realise that 2 year contracts are standard across the competition right? And it doesn’t mean the players who sign them aren’t valued by their clubs?

That doesn’t change the fact it’s a short term contract

You’re wrong brother

Mm don’t think I am mate. Just because they’re common in the league. Ideal amount of time for a player to be tested out by a club sure, but they don’t scream security.

 

[frullens]

I think it will be Simpkin on the move in 2023

Lol no it won’t. He has a long term contract, Liddle doesn’t.

3 years is long term, but 2 isn’t?

Are you just realising 3 is a bigger number than 2 ?

Don’t deflect. Are you trying to say 2 years isn’t long term?

I’m not deflecting. No 2 years isn’t long term. If I sign someone to a 2 year deal around this time starting season 2022, he can sign with a rival club a year later. For a club that has no stability like us, 3 years is a long term deal.

You are reading too much into it.

That’s rich. Go fishing somewhere else

You do realise that 2 year contracts are standard across the competition right? And it doesn’t mean the players who sign them aren’t valued by their clubs?

That doesn’t change the fact it’s a short term contract

You’re wrong brother

This is a crazy argument. But gotta keep the off-season interesting somehow

Its all relative
For TPJ a 1 year contract is long
For Tamaulolo an 7 year contract is short
?

 

[DGilly]

Send Liddle to the Dogs in a player swap deal for Cotric and we’re laughing

Would you like to supersize to Luke Thompson?

Yes but center is more a position of need. However, give them Brooks and I'll take both

 

[Demps]

Send Liddle to the Dogs in a player swap deal for Cotric and we’re laughing

Would you like to supersize to Luke Thompson?

Yes but center is more a position of need. However, give them Brooks and I'll take both

Brooks and Liddle
For
Cotric and Thompson

...?

Perfect for both clubs really.
But we have to roll with Madden x Hastings with Tyrone Roberts (Dragons) as depth until AD's return.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

I think it will be Simpkin on the move in 2023

Lol no it won’t. He has a long term contract, Liddle doesn’t.

3 years is long term, but 2 isn’t?

Are you just realising 3 is a bigger number than 2 ?

Don’t deflect. Are you trying to say 2 years isn’t long term?

I’m not deflecting. No 2 years isn’t long term. If I sign someone to a 2 year deal around this time starting season 2022, he can sign with a rival club a year later. For a club that has no stability like us, 3 years is a long term deal.

You are reading too much into it.

That’s rich. Go fishing somewhere else

You do realise that 2 year contracts are standard across the competition right? And it doesn’t mean the players who sign them aren’t valued by their clubs?

That doesn’t change the fact it’s a short term contract

You’re wrong brother

This is a crazy argument. But gotta keep the off-season interesting somehow

Its all relative
For TPJ a 1 year contract is long
For Tamaulolo an 7 year contract is short
?

It is a ridiculous debate, yes.

 

[batboy]

Woods talk gone quiet.

I think Manly has made him an offer. We’re not interested.

He’s going to the Dragons - been the word for a week of more now

 

[weststigerman]

It’s amazing the lengths people go to in here to prove that they are “right”. Low confidence or self esteem I guess.

 

[Demps]

Woods talk gone quiet.

I think Manly has made him an offer. We’re not interested.

He’s going to the Dragons - been the word for a week of more now

Dragons have been on fire ? with their recruitment...



 

[yeahcaz]

I think it will be Simpkin on the move in 2023

Lol no it won’t. He has a long term contract, Liddle doesn’t.

3 years is long term, but 2 isn’t?

Are you just realising 3 is a bigger number than 2 ?

Don’t deflect. Are you trying to say 2 years isn’t long term?

I’m not deflecting. No 2 years isn’t long term. If I sign someone to a 2 year deal around this time starting season 2022, he can sign with a rival club a year later. For a club that has no stability like us, 3 years is a long term deal.

You are reading too much into it.

That’s rich. Go fishing somewhere else

You do realise that 2 year contracts are standard across the competition right? And it doesn’t mean the players who sign them aren’t valued by their clubs?

That doesn’t change the fact it’s a short term contract

You’re wrong brother

This is a crazy argument. But gotta keep the off-season interesting somehow

Its all relative
For TPJ a 1 year contract is long
For Tamaulolo an 7 year contract is short
?

It is a ridiculous debate, yes.

All started from someone debating that there’s no difference between 3 and 2

 

[GNR4LIFE]

I think it will be Simpkin on the move in 2023

Lol no it won’t. He has a long term contract, Liddle doesn’t.

3 years is long term, but 2 isn’t?

Are you just realising 3 is a bigger number than 2 ?

Don’t deflect. Are you trying to say 2 years isn’t long term?

I’m not deflecting. No 2 years isn’t long term. If I sign someone to a 2 year deal around this time starting season 2022, he can sign with a rival club a year later. For a club that has no stability like us, 3 years is a long term deal.

You are reading too much into it.

That’s rich. Go fishing somewhere else

You do realise that 2 year contracts are standard across the competition right? And it doesn’t mean the players who sign them aren’t valued by their clubs?

That doesn’t change the fact it’s a short term contract

You’re wrong brother

This is a crazy argument. But gotta keep the off-season interesting somehow

Its all relative
For TPJ a 1 year contract is long
For Tamaulolo an 7 year contract is short
?

It is a ridiculous debate, yes.

All started from someone debating that there’s no difference between 3 and 2

There isn’t. Especially when it comes to us when players walk out whenever they want.

 

[Tiger-ferret]

I think it will be Simpkin on the move in 2023

Lol no it won’t. He has a long term contract, Liddle doesn’t.

3 years is long term, but 2 isn’t?

Are you just realising 3 is a bigger number than 2 ?

Don’t deflect. Are you trying to say 2 years isn’t long term?

I’m not deflecting. No 2 years isn’t long term. If I sign someone to a 2 year deal around this time starting season 2022, he can sign with a rival club a year later. For a club that has no stability like us, 3 years is a long term deal.

You are reading too much into it.

That’s rich. Go fishing somewhere else

You do realise that 2 year contracts are standard across the competition right? And it doesn’t mean the players who sign them aren’t valued by their clubs?

That doesn’t change the fact it’s a short term contract

You’re wrong brother

Mm don’t think I am mate. Just because they’re common in the league. Ideal amount of time for a player to be tested out by a club sure, but they don’t scream security.

IMO it’s good if a player doesn’t feel secure. They will work harder to improve. It’s a good thing if they are in demand. Means they are a better than average player. As a club we need to improve on retaining the better players.

 

[yeahcaz]

I think it will be Simpkin on the move in 2023

Lol no it won’t. He has a long term contract, Liddle doesn’t.

3 years is long term, but 2 isn’t?

Are you just realising 3 is a bigger number than 2 ?

Don’t deflect. Are you trying to say 2 years isn’t long term?

I’m not deflecting. No 2 years isn’t long term. If I sign someone to a 2 year deal around this time starting season 2022, he can sign with a rival club a year later. For a club that has no stability like us, 3 years is a long term deal.

You are reading too much into it.

That’s rich. Go fishing somewhere else

You do realise that 2 year contracts are standard across the competition right? And it doesn’t mean the players who sign them aren’t valued by their clubs?

That doesn’t change the fact it’s a short term contract

You’re wrong brother

Mm don’t think I am mate. Just because they’re common in the league. Ideal amount of time for a player to be tested out by a club sure, but they don’t scream security.

IMO it’s good if a player doesn’t feel secure. They will work harder to improve. It’s a good thing if they are in demand. Means they are a better than average player. As a club we need to improve on retaining the better players.

The west’s tigers 2 year deal is the stepping stone to another club deal

 

[hobbo1]

I've been a big fan of Liddle since his debut but he really hasn't shown the service or speed that he had when he was younger before his billion injuries. I suspect they'll develop Simpkin under Hodgson and move lids on. It's a real shame, because Liddle promised so much, but he just hasn't delivered this year.

Yeah he lacks a motor and a kicking game
Punt him