I just think we should invest in our juniors like simpkin and invest hard let blokes like liddle go to another club sure he may flourish under a new coach but long term success wise we benefit from keeping simpkin and bringing in talent like Hodgson and bringing up our young boys like simpkin like Rua and Scolari
I don't understand the hate for Liddle. Can anyone explain where this comes from? And not just "I reckon ".... facts please. I see a capable dummy half who has exploded clear for try's on several occasions and managed a reasonable pack to positive metreage on most occasions. Please explain any improvement you can see with the signing of another hooker. People on here were screaming for Simpkin to be given a go until he was given a go, We saw how that turned out.
No issue with Liddle in the squad here. I think he is a great running 14, solid enough in other aspects of the game.
He is not an 80 minute hooker at NRL level yet, and his service can be patchy. It is hard to say more than "I reckon" as I've never seen a stat for crispness of delivery from DH. They should invent one though. I'd keep him and give Simpkin 12 more months, but if he is white anting at all he has to go (have only seen rumours of it here).
2 things we lack that this switch addresses. Guys that buy into a better culture, and that means playing at 100% irrespective of the coach. And the second is leaders who understand success.
Hodgson is not perfect, but in these 2 areas he is a slight upgrade at worst.
Now we need 1, preferably 2 fast outside backs, and 1 very angry, ugly, stinky forward.
Agree, though I don’t have a problem with a possible signing of Hodgson, just think we have other priorities such as backs and a forward, not hookers?
@tiger-ferret said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492630) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492627) said:
@swordy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1492606) said:
I've heard zero from the club about Hodgson being chased. So what that says to me is that when he stays a Raider or moves to Gold Coast, it will be yet another baseless story about how Wests Tigers botched the signing.
When Journo's start interviewing and quoting other journo's as if it's fact, it's time for the funny farm.
It is the other side of the story that gets too me. Liddle is a very fine player and a loyal WT. I believe he is a captain in waiting at WTs. He is articulate and presents well. He has made an amazing recovery from a very serious knee injury. Injuries of this type take a long time to overcome. I know this as my brother in law was a physio at two former first grade clubs. These posts which want to move him on are in very poor form.
I like and respect Liddle. For tigers to be top eight we need above average players. Is he in the top 4-8 hookers? I personally think he’s reached his ceiling hence the whole not in the future plans talk.