Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

@hsvjones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1502973) said:
How are we not even in the mix for Curtis Scott... He would be starting straight away and fills a need we have.. Not to mention would be cheap and has something to prove..
He will go to the eels cheap and turn out to be another missed opportunity..
Maybe he doesn't fit our recruitment standards or maybe we are in Freeze patten until Sheen arrives but considering the position we are in Sheen won't be sleeping for months with the work he has to do.

Maybe we are going for a no DH policy ?
 
@batboy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503012) said:
@camel2281 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1502987) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1502947) said:
@viking-warrior said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1502946) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1502944) said:
@leck said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1502942) said:
@tigertime-0 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1502888) said:
Andrew Johns and Mitchell Pearce share the same manager !! Join the dots !!!!

The dots are clear and connected, Sheen's statement was an attempt to save face.

I'm not against us allowing Luke moving over to the Knights, but we need to get compensation.

Either they take on Luke's full contract or we do a dollar for dollar contract swap -

Daniel Safiti or Bradman Best + a young gun.

I like Bailey Hodgson. He's Josh's nephew, only 19 but from what I've seen he's a smart fullback that can easily shift into centre or wing if needed.

We need a halfback

Hastings 7. Adds6. Imo

AD gone till round 15 at the earliest. No way can you go half the year with Hastings and Madden as the halves.

Peach can play 6

Yeah... But he's the Best (Maybe only) Centre at the club.

This is unfortunately true.
 
@jrdee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503027) said:
Is a Brooks swap with Lachlan Lamb are fair trade?

How does that work? Brooks to Roosters?
 
This comes as it has also emerged that young Sydney Roosters playmaker Lachlan Lam’s name has been thrown up as a potential player trade option to head to the Wests Tigers so Luke Brooks could in turn move to Newcastle.

It is understood the Roosters have been discreetly looking at options for Lam who will struggle to make Trent Robinson’s top squad next year given Luke Keary’s return from injury to partner young Sam Walker.
 
@jrdee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503025) said:
@hsvjones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1502973) said:
How are we not even in the mix for Curtis Scott... He would be starting straight away and fills a need we have.. Not to mention would be cheap and has something to prove..
He will go to the eels cheap and turn out to be another missed opportunity..
Maybe he doesn't fit our recruitment standards or maybe we are in Freeze patten until Sheen arrives but considering the position we are in Sheen won't be sleeping for months with the work he has to do.

Maybe we are going for a no DH policy ?

I don’t think so, we have plenty of those already.
 
@littlebittipsy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503033) said:
I think it’s Lamb to us and Brooks to Knights???

Is Lam another client of Moses? How about Lam to the Knights? That is a one way move.
 
Lamb over Brooks - Really??

Lamb doesn't even shine in a top 4 side - and is only 3 years behind Brooks...
I see absolutely NO upside to that....

Hutchison is the pick of the back up halves over there - And (surprise, surprise) He's not the one the Roosters are trying to unload.
 
@jrdee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503034) said:
This comes as it has also emerged that young Sydney Roosters playmaker Lachlan Lam’s name has been thrown up as a potential player trade option to head to the Wests Tigers so Luke Brooks could in turn move to Newcastle.

It is understood the Roosters have been discreetly looking at options for Lam who will struggle to make Trent Robinson’s top squad next year given Luke Keary’s return from injury to partner young Sam Walker.

What bs
 
@tigertime-0 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503020) said:
Riddle : How does Newcastle's problem with Mitchell Pearce wanting out suddenly turn into an immediate concern for the Tigers lol ?

Because of Isaac Moses
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503039) said:
@littlebittipsy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503033) said:
I think it’s Lamb to us and Brooks to Knights???

Is Lam another client of Moses? How about Lam to the Knights? That is a one way move.

Lam is with Ayoub.
 
@dazza65 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503044) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503039) said:
@littlebittipsy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503033) said:
I think it’s Lamb to us and Brooks to Knights???

Is Lam another client of Moses? How about Lam to the Knights? That is a one way move.

Lam is with Ayoub.

Ayoub and Sheens are good mates
 
@jrdee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503034) said:
This comes as it has also emerged that young Sydney Roosters playmaker Lachlan Lam’s name has been thrown up as a potential player trade option to head to the Wests Tigers so Luke Brooks could in turn move to Newcastle.

It is understood the Roosters have been discreetly looking at options for Lam who will struggle to make Trent Robinson’s top squad next year given Luke Keary’s return from injury to partner young Sam Walker.

I find this hard to believe.
Roosters would look pretty skinny in the halves if they copped an early injury.
They’ve got Walker, Keary, Hutchinson and Volkman coming through ... have I forgotten someone?
 
Curtis Scott is not good at all. Rubbish player and not a great bloke to boot.

Brooks to Lam is a sideways move, but saves us a bunch of cap space and lets us move on from the failure that was the Luke Brooks era.
 
@lukic said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1503047) said:
Curtis Scott is not good at all. Rubbish player and not a great bloke to boot.

Brooks to Lam is a sideways move, but saves us a bunch of cap space and lets us move on from the failure that was the Luke Brooks era.

CAP.SPACE.FOR.WHAT? - Or Whom?

We've got space as it is for 2 marqee players that we can't fill
- Why leave room for 3?
 
Back
Top