Why do we need to pay him more than what the Bulldogs are offering him ?Question for the forum just curiosity - if you had the option of offering Luai to 2 deals.
1 - 4 years for $4.8 million
2- 5 years for $5.5 million
Which deal do you do? Cause if true that Dogs have offered that extra year at a reduced $ per season. Would you be tempted giving that extra year and dropping 100k each season from our previous offer so we still marginally beat the Dogs offer?
That might be the deal to get it done - not saying we should do it just curious on everyone’s thoughts?
It’s been reported they have offered him a flat 5 million for 5 years.
We don’t need him for 5 years, so if we do desperately want him, why not offer him 3.75 million for 3 years which is 250k per season more than what the Bulldogs are offering and it does not block the pathway for our up and coming halves for longer than what they will hopefully hang around waiting to be regular NRL starting players.