Dennisspicer1
Well-known member
King_sirroYou really are a lunatic the way you react simple replies.
Why would you go to the effort to call me a lunatic
For a reply I sent to another member.
Grow up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
King_sirroYou really are a lunatic the way you react simple replies.
I agree Gallagher. Galvin's neck appears to be in correct proportion to the rest of his body.That's a big call, your sticking your neck out there.
You could probably lay down both offers, but I would simply match the Dogs deal.Question for the forum just curiosity - if you had the option of offering Luai to 2 deals.
1 - 4 years for $4.8 million
2- 5 years for $5.5 million
Which deal do you do? Cause if true that Dogs have offered that extra year at a reduced $ per season. Would you be tempted giving that extra year and dropping 100k each season from our previous offer so we still marginally beat the Dogs offer?
That might be the deal to get it done - not saying we should do it just curious on everyone’s thoughts?
He's worried about you. That's why. We all are.King_sirro
Why would you go to the effort to call me a lunatic
For a reply I sent to another member.
Grow up.
Do we have the SPICE?!All clubs have a Head of recruitment or something the same ?
The Head Coach talks to the CEO
and if agreed upon that they want to offer a player a contract they notify the Head of recruitment who goes through the figures and informs them how it can be done.
e.g
Do we have the money ?
Do we have the space ?
Do we need to let players go to make this happen ?
All are involved in some way in getting the players they want.
Id offer 5 years $6m. Get it doneQuestion for the forum just curiosity - if you had the option of offering Luai to 2 deals.
1 - 4 years for $4.8 million
2- 5 years for $5.5 million
Which deal do you do? Cause if true that Dogs have offered that extra year at a reduced $ per season. Would you be tempted giving that extra year and dropping 100k each season from our previous offer so we still marginally beat the Dogs offer?
That might be the deal to get it done - not saying we should do it just curious on everyone’s thoughts?
I think it comes down to tax. The extra year at Dogs on less money will be taxed more over time and be $125K less per seasonQuestion for the forum just curiosity - if you had the option of offering Luai to 2 deals.
1 - 4 years for $4.8 million
2- 5 years for $5.5 million
Which deal do you do? Cause if true that Dogs have offered that extra year at a reduced $ per season. Would you be tempted giving that extra year and dropping 100k each season from our previous offer so we still marginally beat the Dogs offer?
That might be the deal to get it done - not saying we should do it just curious on everyone’s thoughts?
100%. DCE is 34 years old and is still the QLD origin captain and playing excellent footy at all levels. Halves out of all positions last the longest. Forwards and outside backs who do most of the grunt work retire earlierYou could probably lay down both offers, but I would simply match the Dogs deal.
At 31, I don't think he's done yet. He still has time for another deal. We may even be able to shift him early if Galvin and Fainu are ready for NRL.
Question for the forum just curiosity - if you had the option of offering Luai to 2 deals.
1 - 4 years for $4.8 million
2- 5 years for $5.5 million
Which deal do you do? Cause if true that Dogs have offered that extra year at a reduced $ per season. Would you be tempted giving that extra year and dropping 100k each season from our previous offer so we still marginally beat the Dogs offer?
That might be the deal to get it done - not saying we should do it just curious on everyone’s thoughts?
They go down hill fast though. Look at Thurston. Greatest example of a playse gotmg one season too long. Cam Smith is the greatest example of a player making age look easy.100%. DCE is 34 years old and is still the QLD origin captain and playing excellent footy at all levels. Halves out of all positions last the longest. Forwards and outside backs who do most of the grunt work retire earlier
You seem like a good lad. We would probably get along. Don't listen to what @innsaneink says about me. I won't waste your time.100%. DCE is 34 years old and is still the QLD origin captain and playing excellent footy at all levels. Halves out of all positions last the longest. Forwards and outside backs who do most of the grunt work retire earlier
They go down hill fast though. Look at Thurston. Greatest example of a playse gotmg one season too long. Cam Smith is the greatest example of a player making age look easy.
Just heard on morning radio we've pulled out of the race for Fonua Blake, new management same old same old
As long as we dont sell the farm for them.It seems some of us haven't listened to Shane Richardson's presser closely enough. While he did say juniors provide the base, he also said we need to have the cream. He described us having that cream with some exciting players (like Koroisau and Bula) but he seemed hungry for more. He stated it as not having "all our eggs in one basket" but alludes to having a balance between the cream and the base
As a QLDer, he doesnt worry me at all at 5/8th.played excellent in his debut series when NSW beat QLD 76-6 across two games and he missed the last game NSW lost. The last two years in Origin, he has been better than Cleary. Scored a try in the 2022 decider. Was excellent in game 1 this year. Game 2 was mission impossible with Damien Cook next to him at centre and a new halves partner up in Brisbane down 1-0. Put down the series loss to Freddy picking Nicho at 14 which cost us game 1 big time
I massively disagree. To say that he's not a top 25 player in the game is a ridiculous statement. Origin player, 3x premiership winner and Carried Samoa on his back to a World cup final playing halfback.Missing out on Luai would be a blessing.
We'd make him close to the highest paid player in the game when he's not a top 10 (and frankly top 25) player in the game.
At absolute best, he'd be a slight overpay for a number of years. At worst, a back-breaking contract which sets back our rebuild even further.
I would even cop the overpay if he at lesst showed he was elite at being the no.1 option and leader of his team. Instead we'd be paying him overs and top of the market salary for a role which would be unfamiliar and that he's ultimately unproven in.
Maybe he'd motivated to try and prove people wrong and add to his game? I guess that's a possibility. But jeez when you're paying close to 5m over the length of a deal, you want to be paying it to someone who's absolutely the finished product and not someone you're going to need to level up.