Red88_Tiger
Well-known member
I really don’t believe this. Madge will do whatever he thinks is best for the donkeys
Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion
- Thread starter MacDougall
- Start date
user118245
Well-known member
Feel like I saw a while back we said no
weststigerman
Well-known member
Nothing announced yet. I initially thought Dogs but could be either Panthers or Roosters. Seems like it’s one of the clubs in finals contention or recently knocked out.
We said no or he said no? If it’s us then we’re bloody idiots.
user118245
Well-known member
MiksRL posted on September 12, while other articles posted on that day counter that claim but just speculate we would either be a good destination or a likely one. Remember tho, Richo is no leaks so potentially no word on this could mean something is in the works
Tiger Stripes
Well-known member
Always look forward to your comments BWG. Keep it up please!
No he was a better prop and a bit slow and unfit as a backrower
I will never forgive the Balmain management for treating Artie as badly as they did so we lost him to the rorters,it was also about the same time Dennis Tutty was treated badly also.Terrible management
Fainu Brothers
Well-known member
When is the WT Presentation? Looking forward to the farewell list
851
Well-known member
Only saw Api at the Dally M’s, didn’t see any other players.
Saw To’o collect winger of the year though
Tim Sheens
Well-known member
Apart from that I cannot cop him as a human ever since I watched his massively unnecessary level of violence in Bali, I see him likely ending up with WT as his retirement package benefactor and Gould almost always has ulterior motives, such as burdening a rival.
Concerned about the duration of contracts with the benefactor bit if no club option and okay with them otherwise, particularly as I don't expect Bateman to return and Bird can cover centre.
liltiger
Well-known member
Agree, seems to be a bit strange to me we look great when we push up in support of the ball carrier. Majority of games we just don't it's one out stuff and just looks real pedestrian.
We ran more decoys and supports then any other team in the Comp according to the stats so I'd suggest we are actually pushing up too much and tiring out our defenders
I think, because we're kind of used to so rubbish, that this had been largely overlooked in our 3rd wooden spoon season. Also, the age and inexperience of the 37 (? Not sure of the exact number) players used over the season had to have a big impact too.
Jolls
Well-known member
Those that are hard over on our coaching issues being the root of all evil need to consider these particular stats. This does not happen if you aren't playing to an attacking system. What this points to is the inability of our play makers to make the right decision on who and where to hit or when and where to kick. This is what the good teams do - but they ice it!
Last edited:
426Tlgerland
Well-known member
I would do the 3 at $ 650 k , first 2 well worth it , 3 rd back up
user118245
Well-known member
Have the 3rd as a mutual option
Play the ball speed is 100% correlated to a better outcome. It is all momentum.
Slow play the balls:
- Defenders get back 10m and have time to get set.
- The Defenders meet the attacker around 5m from the play the ball.
Fast play the balls:
- Defenders are on the back foot and only just getting back the 10 when the attacker is playing the ball.
- The attacker makes it 8-10m before contact is made by a defender (so an advantage of 3-5m a tackle).
- Repeat this 4 tackles in a row and the attacker is getting more metres every run (in theory). And when the defence is on the back foot, we generally see an increased run metre from the attacking runner by the 3rd of 4th tackle (10+metres).
EAD manly.
