I wrote an article about Galvins hip drop the other night,
And I pointed out the fact when with Tigers in his first year he was given 4 weeks.
With the Dogs he was not even penalised, but, I was then happy that the Judiciary did mention it the following day, but everyone was stating he would only cop a 1k or 1-5k fine for the offence.
And one of our members sent a reply to my message stating that they no longer worry about the hipdrop anymore.
Well I was just reading about two other hipdrop offences this last weekend,
And both players are tipped to get 4 weeks each for there hipdrops, but no mention of Galvins, so much for they dont worry about it anymore, two things can help a player escape bad results from judiciary,
And they are certain clubs are treated better than others, ( GUS GOULD ???? )
Or, so called SUPERSTARS are given benefit of the doubt.