Apparently we're on the verge of signing Kurt Mann, so I had a look at his numbers because I'm struggling a bit to see what he actually adds to this pack.
I know per-80 stats aren't perfect. Mann is playing about 10 minutes less a game than Seyfarth, so naturally he can go harder in shorter stints. But even allowing for that, I thought the comparison was interesting.
Roughly per 80 mins this year:
Mann
126m
48 tackles
60 fantasy points
Seyfarth
120m
50 tackles
61 fantasy points
That's pretty bloody similar.
Seyfarth has more offloads, Mann gets through slightly more metres, but in terms of basic work rate there really isn't much between them.
And maybe I've got a bit of scar tissue from this sort of signing too.
We've been down the "experienced former Origin player" road a few times. Ballin was 31 and about five years removed from Origin, McQueen was 30 and roughly three years removed, Reynolds was 28 and hadn't played Origin for about three and a half years.
To be fair to Mann, he's different in one important way. He's 33, but he was playing Origin last year. So I'm not saying these are identical situations.
But we've heard the experience, leadership and standards argument before. At 33, I'd still want to know what he's actually adding on the field that we don't already have.
I'm not a Seyfarth fan, so maybe that colours my view, but do we really get better by adding another player who statistically gives us pretty much the same output?
I get the utility argument with Mann. If we didn't have a bench hooker I could see the value in someone who can cover 9 and 13.
But we've signed Brailey. You'd assume he's 14 most weeks behind Api.
So Mann is basically competing for one of the remaining forward spots on the bench.
If that's the case, I'd rather that spot go to someone who gives us something we don't already have. More size, leg speed, impact, whatever.
Maybe I'm missing something, but does another Seyfarth clon actually make this side better?