Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054009) said:
Momo is fine as a centre/utility back. I'd have him ahead of Jennings, Marsters, Mbye and on par with Nof.

To beat the top sides we need pace and we have none. Literally no one in our top 30 is fast and could conceivably score a length of the field try. Brooks maybe just.

If we sign Lomax it won't necessarily be at the expense of Momo. He's done more than enough to keep his spot. Momo would work best with a fast player inside/outside him. Like when he took the intercept but had no chance of scoring, if he had someone fast next to him, we score. Instead he had Nof.


Nofo would’ve scored if Momo had of passed I reckon !
 
@WT2K only reason why he had to pace to chase down the fox is because he’d did jack all for the first 78mins.....
 
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054010) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054009) said:
Momo is fine as a centre/utility back. I'd have him ahead of Jennings, Marsters, Mbye and on par with Nof.

To beat the top sides we need pace and we have none. Literally no one in our top 30 is fast and could conceivably score a length of the field try. Brooks maybe just.

If we sign Lomax it won't necessarily be at the expense of Momo. He's done more than enough to keep his spot. Momo would work best with a fast player inside/outside him. Like when he took the intercept but had no chance of scoring, if he had someone fast next to him, we score. Instead he had Nof.


Nofo would’ve scored if Momo had of passed I reckon !

That would have meant a 95m TRY..we don't do those..

Watching again Nof picked him up pretty quickly given a 10m head start..
 
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054010) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054009) said:
Momo is fine as a centre/utility back. I'd have him ahead of Jennings, Marsters, Mbye and on par with Nof.

To beat the top sides we need pace and we have none. Literally no one in our top 30 is fast and could conceivably score a length of the field try. Brooks maybe just.

If we sign Lomax it won't necessarily be at the expense of Momo. He's done more than enough to keep his spot. Momo would work best with a fast player inside/outside him. Like when he took the intercept but had no chance of scoring, if he had someone fast next to him, we score. Instead he had Nof.


Nofo would’ve scored if Momo had of passed I reckon !

I think there was a bit of risk there with the Knights players around. I'm glad he took the tackle.
 
@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054018) said:
Nofo would’ve scored if Momo had of passed I reckon !
That would have meant a 95m TRY..we don't do those..
Watching again Nof picked him up pretty quickly given a 10m head start..

Watching live I thought that was the case too. Watching the replay there was cover coming from the other side which would have jammed him as soon as he caught it. In retrospect it probably showed maturity that Momo took the tackle as we scored soon afterwards.

Even the fastest guys get run down when they're under fatigue (cite Addo Car over the weekend).

We played attractive football on the weekend, not often I watch a replay even after a win.
 
@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054018) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054010) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054009) said:
Momo is fine as a centre/utility back. I'd have him ahead of Jennings, Marsters, Mbye and on par with Nof.

To beat the top sides we need pace and we have none. Literally no one in our top 30 is fast and could conceivably score a length of the field try. Brooks maybe just.

If we sign Lomax it won't necessarily be at the expense of Momo. He's done more than enough to keep his spot. Momo would work best with a fast player inside/outside him. Like when he took the intercept but had no chance of scoring, if he had someone fast next to him, we score. Instead he had Nof.


Nofo would’ve scored if Momo had of passed I reckon !

That would have meant a 95m TRY..we don't do those..

Watching again Nof picked him up pretty quickly given a 10m head start..

95m lol
They were just over half way lol
 
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054031) said:
@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054018) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054010) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054009) said:
Momo is fine as a centre/utility back. I'd have him ahead of Jennings, Marsters, Mbye and on par with Nof.

To beat the top sides we need pace and we have none. Literally no one in our top 30 is fast and could conceivably score a length of the field try. Brooks maybe just.

If we sign Lomax it won't necessarily be at the expense of Momo. He's done more than enough to keep his spot. Momo would work best with a fast player inside/outside him. Like when he took the intercept but had no chance of scoring, if he had someone fast next to him, we score. Instead he had Nof.


Nofo would’ve scored if Momo had of passed I reckon !

That would have meant a 95m TRY..we don't do those..

Watching again Nof picked him up pretty quickly given a 10m head start..

95m lol
They were just over half way lol

From where the intercept was taken duh..you count that don't you..
 
@hammertime said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054021) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054010) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054009) said:
Momo is fine as a centre/utility back. I'd have him ahead of Jennings, Marsters, Mbye and on par with Nof.

To beat the top sides we need pace and we have none. Literally no one in our top 30 is fast and could conceivably score a length of the field try. Brooks maybe just.

If we sign Lomax it won't necessarily be at the expense of Momo. He's done more than enough to keep his spot. Momo would work best with a fast player inside/outside him. Like when he took the intercept but had no chance of scoring, if he had someone fast next to him, we score. Instead he had Nof.


Nofo would’ve scored if Momo had of passed I reckon !

I think there was a bit of risk there with the Knights players around. I'm glad he took the tackle.


Fortune favours the brave ..
Not that it cost us .
 
@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054009) said:
Momo is fine as a centre/utility back. I'd have him ahead of Jennings, Marsters, Mbye and on par with Nof.

To beat the top sides we need pace and we have none. Literally no one in our top 30 is fast and could conceivably score a length of the field try. Brooks maybe just.

If we sign Lomax it won't necessarily be at the expense of Momo. He's done more than enough to keep his spot. Momo would work best with a fast player inside/outside him. Like when he took the intercept but had no chance of scoring, if he had someone fast next to him, we score. Instead he had Nof.


Mbye and Marsters well above Momo for mine. Tries hard but is slower than David Klemmer.
 
@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054032) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054031) said:
@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054018) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054010) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054009) said:
Momo is fine as a centre/utility back. I'd have him ahead of Jennings, Marsters, Mbye and on par with Nof.

To beat the top sides we need pace and we have none. Literally no one in our top 30 is fast and could conceivably score a length of the field try. Brooks maybe just.

If we sign Lomax it won't necessarily be at the expense of Momo. He's done more than enough to keep his spot. Momo would work best with a fast player inside/outside him. Like when he took the intercept but had no chance of scoring, if he had someone fast next to him, we score. Instead he had Nof.


Nofo would’ve scored if Momo had of passed I reckon !

That would have meant a 95m TRY..we don't do those..

Watching again Nof picked him up pretty quickly given a 10m head start..

95m lol
They were just over half way lol

From where the intercept was taken duh..you count that don't you..


No you count it from where the pass wasn’t made to nofo ..duh
 
Think Momo did the right thing. If you can't get a good pass away to someone in a better position. TAKE THE TACKLE!

He did and we scored soon after.

That is called having a football brain.
 
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054045) said:
@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054032) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054031) said:
@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054018) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054010) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054009) said:
Momo is fine as a centre/utility back. I'd have him ahead of Jennings, Marsters, Mbye and on par with Nof.

To beat the top sides we need pace and we have none. Literally no one in our top 30 is fast and could conceivably score a length of the field try. Brooks maybe just.

If we sign Lomax it won't necessarily be at the expense of Momo. He's done more than enough to keep his spot. Momo would work best with a fast player inside/outside him. Like when he took the intercept but had no chance of scoring, if he had someone fast next to him, we score. Instead he had Nof.


Nofo would’ve scored if Momo had of passed I reckon !

That would have meant a 95m TRY..we don't do those..

Watching again Nof picked him up pretty quickly given a 10m head start..

95m lol
They were just over half way lol

From where the intercept was taken duh..you count that don't you..


No you count it from where the pass wasn’t made to nofo ..duh

How did Nofo get there to be in the position to accept the pass..teleport..duh
 
@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054049) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054045) said:
@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054032) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054031) said:
@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054018) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054010) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1054009) said:
Momo is fine as a centre/utility back. I'd have him ahead of Jennings, Marsters, Mbye and on par with Nof.

To beat the top sides we need pace and we have none. Literally no one in our top 30 is fast and could conceivably score a length of the field try. Brooks maybe just.

If we sign Lomax it won't necessarily be at the expense of Momo. He's done more than enough to keep his spot. Momo would work best with a fast player inside/outside him. Like when he took the intercept but had no chance of scoring, if he had someone fast next to him, we score. Instead he had Nof.


Nofo would’ve scored if Momo had of passed I reckon !

That would have meant a 95m TRY..we don't do those..

Watching again Nof picked him up pretty quickly given a 10m head start..

95m lol
They were just over half way lol

From where the intercept was taken duh..you count that don't you..


No you count it from where the pass wasn’t made to nofo ..duh

How did Nofo get there to be in the position to accept the pass..teleport..duh


Are you Happy’s 1/2 brother ?
If the pass would’ve been made ,
Nofo would have only had to run 34 meters to score ..
Where Nofo came from is irrelevant ..duh

Gawd
 
Lomax is a nuffie? Lolwot...
He's an up and coming star.

Would be an amazing signing...
 
@Spartan117 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1053788) said:
I'm sorry guys,

We aren't getting new toys till we have finished or donated the old ones....

TBH no one wants the old ones especially if there hidden and no one can see em.

2021 at the earliest.

Ps thx Cleary.

I wish I had your way with words ....... x 100
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top