@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208443) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208442) said:@willow said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1208432) said:Proctor adds nothing to our team except raising the average age of the squad. Turning 32 next year...precisely the type of signing that will prevent the club from moving forward.
He’s better than all our second rowers bar Leilua. Garner has some games where he’s better and some where he’s worse.
I don’t see any other better options for a second rower and we still need one particularly an experienced one.
For cheap and on a two year deal what harm is there in signing him? Just because he’s not gonna score 10 tries a season and run people over doesn’t mean he’s bad
As someone has mentioned, if he comes here we're not getting him on the cheap.. Additionally, he's not any better than Garner but at 24 at least Garner has some upside. Proctor will be going backwards.
I'm all for signing some new backrowers but I can't see this being a good move at all. I can't imagine us all here in 2 or 3 years time saying "gee i'm glad we signed Kevin Proctor"
Why wouldn’t we get him for $300-$350k? Don’t see any other clubs lining up for him. Unless he goes to England he won’t be offered big money by anyone - if he doesn’t want to accept that offer and stay at GC then let him.
I’ve not seen proctor go backwards. He’s played good footy this year - has another good year in him then 2022 you’re expecting Blore to have cemented himself as our starter and proctor is good depth.
I don’t see many back rowers available either. If we can find someone better I’m all for it.
