@hodgo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1209874) said:
I always struggle with this forum at times like these tbh. I understand everyone is entitled to there opinion however I just don’t understand alot of people on here.
So far we have had
Talau over jac
Are you able to articulate the opinions you disagree with a little more precisely than this?
What do you mean some are saying "Talau over JAC" ?
In what way mate if you haven't been reading the many opinions that are on the previous pages ill fill you in.
alot of poster would not trade talau for jac or liddle for grant. After that read my above posts about my complaints.
The point I was trying to make is that we are not simply talking about "trading" Talau for JAC, which your post implies.
In other words, the proposition is not that we take JAC for what the Storm are paying him and they take Talau for what we are paying him, which is the way the Grant/Momo swap worked.
If that was what is proposed then I would agree. But it's not.
We will have to pay marquee money to get JAC ( a hell of a lot more than the Storm are currently paying him) which I think can be justified.
But on top of that we are supposed to give up Talau as well, who has plenty of upside, but virtually no downside since he is on minimal money.
Some of us think that is going too far.
We are not saying we think Talau is a better footballer. We are saying we want both of them.
Thankfully, it looks like the club agrees.