SMH: Maguire not the problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Guest
Maguire not the problem: Brooks in cross-hairs as Tigers ask ‘where to now?’
By Michael Chammas
April 12, 2021 — 6.00am

Michael Maguire has a clause in his recently-extended two-year contract that would allow the Wests Tigers to hit the eject button without much of an impact to the bottom line.

It’s the protection mechanism that the club were adamant they needed in case the rumblings around Maguire’s relationship with the players spilled over and left them with no choice but to part ways.

If Tigers powerbrokers believed sacking the coach would fix the problems that saw them humiliated in the first half of their loss to the previously hapless Cowboys, the club would not hesitate in triggering the termination and moving on.

But instead the questions aren’t being asked of the coach, with the blow torch now firmly pointed at under-siege halfback Luke Brooks as his career at the embattled club reaches a crossroad.

Sitting atop the grandstand at Leichhardt Oval, the club’s hierarchy watched on in disbelief as to how, in front of a packed home crowd in what was meant to be a tribute to Tommy Raudonikis, one of the most passionate men in rugby league history, the team put in such an uninspired performance.

At half time one of the most respected figures in rugby league walked into the corporate suite full of Tigers directors and hanger-onners to an avalanche of questions.

“What is our problem?” they asked. The conversation went on for some time, but the key point was made. “I tell you what isn’t the problem, your coach,” the person replied.

Clearly the Tigers held concerns about the coach otherwise they wouldn’t have felt the need to include the clause in the contract, however at this point in time Maguire is under no pressures to keep his job.

The same can’t be said for the halfback. The Wests Tigers have stuck by Brooks for the best part of a decade. He’s one of their own. A local junior. Brooks is a fantastic ambassador for the club and has worked tirelessly to help turn the joint venture’s fortunes around, but the reality is he has failed to deliver a single finals game in his eight seasons in the top grade.

However their faith in Brooks has all-but dwindled to the point of no return, with the club set to ponder a future without the halfback despite having two more years to run on his $900,000-a-season deal.

Is he a halfback? Can he control a football team? The questions will be rampant again this week. Ironically the man sitting in the away coach’s box on Sunday afternoon, Cowboys coach Todd Payten, could hold the solution to both the Tigers and Brooks’ woes.

Payten has a close relationship with Brooks having coached him in the club’s juniors. To think he is not speaking to the halfback about a future outside of the Wests Tigers would be naive.

Several of Brooks’ closest confidants are also encouraging the 26-year-old to consider life at another club. The Cowboys are expected to have close to an extra $1m to spend in the salary cap if Michael Morgan is granted a medical retirement after he succumbed to a shoulder injury and hung up the boots during the week.

The Cowboys are after Adam Reynolds as a halfback, but there is also an appetite to lure Brooks as a five-eighth in a combination that would take the pressure of controlling the football team away from the Tigers No.7.

A few months ago the club considered making a play for Mitchell Pearce, but their faith in Brooks prevented them from acting on it. After Sunday’s loss, in which a knock-on from Brooks in the dying seconds denied the Tigers a chance at snatching a miracle last-ditch win, the club has changed its tune.

Two weeks ago Phil Gould tweeted: “Luke Brooks is NOT the problem with Tigers. Tigers may well be the problem for Luke Brooks”.

There’s no doubt there are people trying to convince Brooks that is the case. Those trying to convince the Tigers it is the other way around might have just succeeded.
 
I don't think Brooks is the main problem but he's clearly not a 7.... he can play well but he's not the man you want to have leading your team around. He's much better suited to 5/8. You cannot blame the club for giving up on him though, he's been here for 8 years and has had 2 good seasons?

Also I'm glad the club has a fail safe in case Madge fails - should help the people worried about his extension sleep at night. Club was very smart in their dealings there.
 
If the powerbrokers are asking the question of this figure, maybe they should be approaching the person for a paid role in getting this place sorted.
 
Poor guy gets all the blame. Interesting article - looks like those in power are turning on the players but that could change pretty quickly.

Given how good the juniors are looking I’d stick with Madge

I don’t know tho who’s to blame for the first grade recruitment?
 
In the cold light of Morning im not sure how Brooks is to blame for that effort. The defence qas horrible on the other side of the field - the Douehi, Roberts, Nofa was where all the problems were
 
@jc99 said in [SMH: Maguire not the problem](/post/1334412) said:
I don't think Brooks is the main problem but he's clearly not a 7.... he can play well but he's not the man you want to have leading your team around. He's much better suited to 5/8. You cannot blame the club for giving up on him though, he's been here for 8 years and has had 2 good seasons?

Also I'm glad the club has a fail safe in case Madge fails - should help the people worried about his extension sleep at night. Club was very smart in their dealings there.

Do we agree AD is a 6 yet?
 
@tony-soprano said in [SMH: Maguire not the problem](/post/1334418) said:
@jc99 said in [SMH: Maguire not the problem](/post/1334412) said:
I don't think Brooks is the main problem but he's clearly not a 7.... he can play well but he's not the man you want to have leading your team around. He's much better suited to 5/8. You cannot blame the club for giving up on him though, he's been here for 8 years and has had 2 good seasons?

Also I'm glad the club has a fail safe in case Madge fails - should help the people worried about his extension sleep at night. Club was very smart in their dealings there.

Do we agree AD is a 6 yet?

He's definitely a 6. Needs to work on his short kicking but he's got good passing, good bombs and a good running game and he's still only learning. Been one of our best lately
 
Tbh, it’s not Brooks fault that he doesn’t have the ability everyone expects. Someone the other night was saying he should see what Sam Walker did the other night and learn a thing or two as if it’s that easy. If it were, every halfback would be doing it, and what Walker did would not have been that special. Im not a fan of Brooks, but I at least see him for what he is. If you want to get angry at someone, blame the coaches that have constantly picked him every week and re-signed him every time his contract was up. That’s on them, not Brooks.
 
I really don't know. I don't blame Brooks at all for our woes. But there simply hasn't been enough highlights in relation to games played. I'm sure there's a mathematical formula.

Can someone please work one out?

Money earned
Career games
Mom awards
Length of contract
 
Officials wiping their hands of this little disaster? Blaming one player when he was one of the few who played well disgusts me. The question is was Maguire across this article? I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. If he was I'd be the first to have the club ring John Morris.
 
.............. At half time one of the most respected figures in rugby league walked into the corporate suite full of Tigers directors and hanger-onners to an avalanche of questions............

Blocker?
 
Last year, the club identified speed and leadership as the 2 biggest weaknesses.

We bought Tamou but ýou don't fix the leadership gap with just him. Particularly if he only plays 26 mins.

I've been supporting Brooks and hoping it works out but fact is we need a controlling confident halfback who can lead this team around the park.

2 things that stood out to me:
In that first half we were all bunch up and heads down. Needer a halfback to boss the guys around and organise.
Also attacking in their 20, Brooks can't break them down.

Not many options out there for quality halfback. We need to make a big play for Reynolds (Adam not Josh 😅). Has a connection with Madge, Douehi and Roberts.

Ps. Not sure if we fixed the speed issue yet either. Roberts did not chase those first couple of tries. Isnt he meant to be one of the fastest players in the comp???
 
The consistent blame on Brooks is beyond ridiculous but is so firmly entrenched, for his sake he should leave. Payten is the perfect coach for him and getting away from Sydney for a bit would do wonders for his mental health and probably his game. I'd love to see him playing good footy but can't see it happening here with a fan base who has lost tolerance for losing, and large portion of them deciding he is at the centre of the problem.
 
Who are they referring to here

At half time one of the most respected figures in rugby league walked into the corporate suite full of Tigers directors and hanger-onners to an avalanche of questions.
 
Back
Top