rustycage
Well-known member
@bagnf05 said in [South Sydney's Latrell Mitchell in hot water](/post/1341333) said:
No, they can stay. Kick out the roosters, sharks and Manly. Just treat Sounffs like the scum they are with fair and just penalties.
South Sydney's Latrell Mitchell in hot water
- Thread starter Newtown
- Start date
- Status
No, they can stay. Kick out the roosters, sharks and Manly. Just treat Sounffs like the scum they are with fair and just penalties.
bathursttiger1
Well-known member
@tiger_one said in [South Sydney's Latrell Mitchell in hot water](/post/1341350) said:
You have to watch Graham Annesley’s weekly review where he tries to explain away all the referees stuff ups.
He’s like a big pair of underpants covers all there rear ends, with polly speak BS.
twentyforty
Well-known member
What about this coward shot on Josh Reynolds last year? I’m surprised he’s still got a contract?
 https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/3a8435a37fa5e4127f0e2d14482ed980?width=700
 https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/3a8435a37fa5e4127f0e2d14482ed980?width=700
BAGNF05
Well-known member
@bathursttiger1 said in [South Sydney's Latrell Mitchell in hot water](/post/1341364) said:
Great for insomniacs
Blocker1963
Well-known member
Got the feeling that JTJ isn't a fan of Latrell, everytime he got the ball JTJ went after him, could be wrong. Also thought JTJ really had a go and is getting back to his best, hope so.
NRL.cpm
Wests Tigers coach Michael Maguire has revealed he plans to follow up the NRL over a number of controversial moments during his side's loss to South Sydney.
Maguire's frustrations come on the back of two separate incidents involving South Sydney fullback Latrell Mitchell, who is facing a four-week ban for a high shot on winger David Nofoaluma that occurred during the first half
Mitchell, who was placed on report for his incident with Nofoaluma at the time, found himself in hot water again, when he appeared to kick forward Luke Garner late in the second half of the match.
But Mitchell's incident with Garner went unnoticed at the time and South Sydney, who were trailing by eight points, moments later received a penalty as the momentum in the game shifted.
Tigers coach Michael Maguire (Getty)
Maguire after the match said it was a "massive" momentum changer as he called on the NRL to look at more ways for the bunker to intervene. The Tigers coach also pointed out that he felt Mitchell made contact with the sideline when had the ball just moments before the incident with Garner occurred.
And today he doubled down on his comments, revealing he plans to follow up on Saturday's incidents with NRL head of football Graham Annesley.
"Yeah definitely [we will speak with the NRL]," Maguire told Triple M
Wests Tigers coach Michael Maguire has revealed he plans to follow up the NRL over a number of controversial moments during his side's loss to South Sydney.
Maguire's frustrations come on the back of two separate incidents involving South Sydney fullback Latrell Mitchell, who is facing a four-week ban for a high shot on winger David Nofoaluma that occurred during the first half
Mitchell, who was placed on report for his incident with Nofoaluma at the time, found himself in hot water again, when he appeared to kick forward Luke Garner late in the second half of the match.
But Mitchell's incident with Garner went unnoticed at the time and South Sydney, who were trailing by eight points, moments later received a penalty as the momentum in the game shifted.
Tigers coach Michael Maguire (Getty)
Maguire after the match said it was a "massive" momentum changer as he called on the NRL to look at more ways for the bunker to intervene. The Tigers coach also pointed out that he felt Mitchell made contact with the sideline when had the ball just moments before the incident with Garner occurred.
And today he doubled down on his comments, revealing he plans to follow up on Saturday's incidents with NRL head of football Graham Annesley.
"Yeah definitely [we will speak with the NRL]," Maguire told Triple M
"As a club, they're supportive of everything that we're doing.
"No doubt the club, myself and Graham Annesley will be chatting about why those decisions weren't adjudicated at that moment in time, in what they should have been.
"We have the technology to make those decisions at that moment in time, they need to be made in the correct manner."
"No doubt the club, myself and Graham Annesley will be chatting about why those decisions weren't adjudicated at that moment in time, in what they should have been.
"We have the technology to make those decisions at that moment in time, they need to be made in the correct manner."
Imagine if that was BJ? He would have been sent off and got 6 weeks.
I would love to see somebody like Jim Comans in charge of the judiciary again.He was appointed to "clean up" the game and he did so with complete impartiality and fairness.If you were doing thug acts when you went to the judiciary you got what you deserved.There was none of the grade 1 2 3 rubbish there is today where the prescribed suspension is limited by the level of charge.
It was far simpler and fairer in those days
It was far simpler and fairer in those days
Cairnstigers
New member
Latrell is fighting his charge
If this mug successfully fights his 4 week charge and only gets a week I will be absolutely livid
It will well and truly show the absolute bias towards certain clubs and players
The nrl says it wants to clean up the game well lets see it
I will be real passed if he gets anything less then the 4 weeks
Latrells elbow/forearm was much more dangerous then the Coat hanger tackle of Hetherington
Latrell gets 3 to 4 weeks Max for an elbow and a Malicious kick towards someone's face
Hetherington 5 to 6 weeks for a coat hanger
Nofoaluma was hurt more
Garner could have lost his eye
And Latrell wants 1 week maximum
Come on
Who does this bloke think he is
God ?
If this mug successfully fights his 4 week charge and only gets a week I will be absolutely livid
It will well and truly show the absolute bias towards certain clubs and players
The nrl says it wants to clean up the game well lets see it
I will be real passed if he gets anything less then the 4 weeks
Latrells elbow/forearm was much more dangerous then the Coat hanger tackle of Hetherington
Latrell gets 3 to 4 weeks Max for an elbow and a Malicious kick towards someone's face
Hetherington 5 to 6 weeks for a coat hanger
Nofoaluma was hurt more
Garner could have lost his eye
And Latrell wants 1 week maximum
Come on
Who does this bloke think he is
God ?
momo_amp_medo
Well-known member
Bloke is an idiot.
Majority of his tackles are questionable and should result in a penalty if it was anyone not called Latrell Mitchell.
Protected species!
Majority of his tackles are questionable and should result in a penalty if it was anyone not called Latrell Mitchell.
Protected species!
@cairnstigers said in [South Sydney's Latrell Mitchell in hot water](/post/1341783) said:
If he succeeds with the NRL 'judiciary' appeal to the NSW courts and lodge an injunction seeking to prevent him return to the field and the NRL judiciary hear any more cases until the concept of fairness of result is tested in a true court.
tony soprano
Well-known member
Hope you are ready for a reduced sentence.
- Status
