Tackle on Ryan without the ball.

[Long_Distance_Tiger]

Quite right Stryker. As I said previously, we should have been ahead by at least 20\. If we'd been able to capitalise on the opportunities we had, the final try would have meant diddly squat!!

 

[matty_tiepie]

yes we should have won by plenty but that does not take away the fact that we were still very unlucky with that being given a try. i bet if the situation was the other way around it would have been given no try as we dont seem to get many 50 50 decisions.

 

[simonthetiger]

So because we should have been in front by plenty its ok that a huge refereeing blunder costs us the game??

May as well add it was Sheens/Fitzy/Simmons…..not Folkesy's fault.
\
\
Reeeeeeeeediculous.

 

[Paris_Cobbs]

Even if we had been 20 points ahead, it's six points against the for and against differential. Don't forget we missed the play-offs on for and against in 2007.

It absolutely was not a try. You can't barrel into someone without the ball, whether it's deliberate or not. We probably would have hung on for a win, which was what we needed even if it was meritless.

 

[Spartan117]

In Summary most commentators online have agreed that the TIGERS were hard done by with that decission.

What can you do??? We should have been up by 12…

I reckon Sheens should Be Sacked....

 

[IronTiger]

Move along nothing to see here….