happy_tiger
Well-known member
@Geo. said:@happy tiger said:Hang on , when we first brought this up CB suggested we just pick players and didn't have to worry whether they were openers or not
This where this has got so confusing , even with the all rounder thing that Geo brought up yesterday and now with the openers
I brought up one particular idea , CB slightly altered it (as far as openers and something else was concerned )and as far as I knew nothing was changed after that
When was this changed to 1/ pick actual openers and b/ how the line up would be picked as far as all rounders were concerned ??
For your information…page 12 of the banter thread...Sabre is running the comp...
Sabre » December 1st, 2015, 5:50 pm
>
I have decided on the voting process:
>
1st vote will be for the opening batsmen
2nd vote will be for batsmen 3-5
Note these 2 votes will EXCLUDE All rounders and wicket keepers chosen there.
For example in CB's case, Kallis will be his all-rounder and his number 6 will fill the gap for the 3-5s
>
3rd vote will be All-rounders
4th vote will be wicket keepers
5th vote will be pace bowlers
6th vote will be spinners
>
I decided to split the batsmen to make voting a bit easier. 50 players would be a huge task.
A / I had picked Pollock by that stage , what I had to then pick a 2nd all rounder ??
B/ So we had to read every page of the banter thread to get the new rules …..