Tevita Pangai Junior

@851 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412969) said:
@sausagesorcerer said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412836) said:
Dufty
Burton
JAC
Naden
TPJ
Vaughan
I’d happily take any of them haha.

Yes I agree, but plenty on here keep rubbishing the Dogs and their recruitment, I don't get it, Barrett can attract good players, Madge can't attract a fly to a turd

He must be Vegan
 
@cairnstigers said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412994) said:
@851 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412969) said:
@sausagesorcerer said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412836) said:
Dufty
Burton
JAC
Naden
TPJ
Vaughan
I’d happily take any of them haha.

Yes I agree, but plenty on here keep rubbishing the Dogs and their recruitment, I don't get it, Barrett can attract good players, Madge can't attract a fly to a turd

He must be Vegan

Made me laugh, and as a supporter of this club, by god we need too
 
@851 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412969) said:
@sausagesorcerer said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412836) said:
Dufty
Burton
JAC
Naden
TPJ
Vaughan
I’d happily take any of them haha.

Yes I agree, but plenty on here keep rubbishing the Dogs and their recruitment, I don't get it, Barrett can attract good players, Madge can't attract a fly to a turd

After we somehow butchered the JAC deal i lost faith.if some of these Bulldog signings perform to their potential they will definitely make the 8
 
@balmain-boy said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412962) said:
@iwasright said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412837) said:
@sausagesorcerer said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412836) said:
Dufty
JAC
Naden
TPJ
Vaughan
I’d happily take any of them haha.

Dogs are getting Vaughan for $350000 cause no other club wants him

Highly doubt that. For one, will the nrl even register his contract? Big questions mark about that, even if they do, will they allow the dogs to register him at less than half his current contract value? No.


The NRL didnt de-register him, they suspended him for 8 matches. When he serves those 8 matches, he can play. Saints sacked him. New club can sign him
 
@needaname said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413018) said:
^ didn’t everyone say that about the Titans?
Look at the Warriors, same position as us currently. 5 straight losses.

Both have not lived up to expectation - definitely
 
@sausagesorcerer said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412836) said:
Dufty
Burton
JAC
Naden
TPJ
Vaughan
I’d happily take any of them haha.

Naden and Dufty are pretty ordinary targets. I thought we were trying to improve Tigers.
 
@tigerap said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412974) said:
@willow said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412957) said:
@jirskyr said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412914) said:
@willow said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412877) said:
@iwasright said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412824) said:
If the dogs match what TPJ wants and they aren’t far off it he will sign with the dogs. TPJ manager prefers dogs over tigers

Does he?

It's a funny one - he "prefers" Team X, but only if they can pay him K dollars. If not, then he prefers the Team Y who does pay him K dollars. Seems really that he just likes K dollars.

I'm hearing his asking price has come down, mainly because no one was willing to pay what was originally asked.

To what price?

That wasn't divulged to me. All I know it has come down to a price that WT are willing to pay.
 
@sausagesorcerer said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413009) said:
@851 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412969) said:
@sausagesorcerer said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412836) said:
Dufty
Burton
JAC
Naden
TPJ
Vaughan
I’d happily take any of them haha.

Yes I agree, but plenty on here keep rubbishing the Dogs and their recruitment, I don't get it, Barrett can attract good players, Madge can't attract a fly to a turd

After we somehow butchered the JAC deal i lost faith.if some of these Bulldog signings perform to their potential they will definitely make the 8

But, would you pay 650-750K for JAC over, what was it? 4 years?
 
@willow said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413071) said:
@tigerap said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412974) said:
@willow said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412957) said:
@jirskyr said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412914) said:
@willow said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412877) said:
@iwasright said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412824) said:
If the dogs match what TPJ wants and they aren’t far off it he will sign with the dogs. TPJ manager prefers dogs over tigers

Does he?

It's a funny one - he "prefers" Team X, but only if they can pay him K dollars. If not, then he prefers the Team Y who does pay him K dollars. Seems really that he just likes K dollars.

I'm hearing his asking price has come down, mainly because no one was willing to pay what was originally asked.

To what price?

That wasn't divulged to me. All I know it has come down to a price that WT are willing to pay.

That is correct. I know for a fact that TPJ manager is having a meeting with bulldogs today trying to convince them to pay that little extra. Dez does not want if to come from a toxic team to another if the bulldogs don’t agree we might have a chance
 
@tiger5150 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413016) said:
The NRL didnt de-register him, they suspended him for 8 matches. When he serves those 8 matches, he can play. Saints sacked him. New club can sign him

The Club that picks him up will own that suspension time...
 
@djg-tiger said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413084) said:
@sausagesorcerer said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413009) said:
@851 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412969) said:
@sausagesorcerer said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412836) said:
Dufty
Burton
JAC
Naden
TPJ
Vaughan
I’d happily take any of them haha.

Yes I agree, but plenty on here keep rubbishing the Dogs and their recruitment, I don't get it, Barrett can attract good players, Madge can't attract a fly to a turd

After we somehow butchered the JAC deal i lost faith.if some of these Bulldog signings perform to their potential they will definitely make the 8

But, would you pay 650-750K for JAC over, what was it? 4 years?

Yeah probably
AD is on something similar,as is Brooks not to mention Mbye ?
 
@spartan117 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413130) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413016) said:
The NRL didnt de-register him, they suspended him for 8 matches. When he serves those 8 matches, he can play. Saints sacked him. New club can sign him

The Club that picks him up will own that suspension time...


100% but the post I was referring to said that the NRL wouldnt register him. They never de-registered him and as soon as that suspension is served he can play for who ever.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413164) said:
@spartan117 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413130) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413016) said:
The NRL didnt de-register him, they suspended him for 8 matches. When he serves those 8 matches, he can play. Saints sacked him. New club can sign him

The Club that picks him up will own that suspension time...


100% but the post I was referring to said that the NRL wouldnt register him. They never de-registered him and as soon as that suspension is served he can play for who ever.

The poster your referring to is a bit wiser than that.
He would of meant the NRL wouldn’t agree to $350 as a nominal value of Vaughn’s contract.
Which I have to agree, Vaughn’s market value despite his recent suspension would be about $550.
Edit. Unless;
If the dogs were to pick him up next year they could very well sign him for $350 as he would be only playing for 2/3rds of the season.
So a wise accountant would make that his first year salary to factor in the time lost in suspension.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412352) said:
@gnr4life said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412184) said:
@spartan117 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412153) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1412067) said:
Wait until you see tomorrows article
JAC ,Tedesco and Moses bury the knives in why they left the WT’s
Bulldog Ritchie story

Thats Jason Taylor and poor management.

Theyre gone and slowly is the garbage WT culture....

Taylor was already gone. They had the option to stay and play under Ivan if they REALLY wanted to be here. But they didn’t.


I hate Ivan and what he did to us, but can you imagine an alternate universe where the big four AND Cleary stayed?

I'd rather not, I'd hate to think the sort of success we may have enjoyed.
 
@needaname said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413189) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413164) said:
@spartan117 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413130) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413016) said:
The NRL didnt de-register him, they suspended him for 8 matches. When he serves those 8 matches, he can play. Saints sacked him. New club can sign him

The Club that picks him up will own that suspension time...


100% but the post I was referring to said that the NRL wouldnt register him. They never de-registered him and as soon as that suspension is served he can play for who ever.

The poster your referring to is a bit wiser than that.
He would of meant the NRL wouldn’t agree to $350 as a nominal value of Vaughn’s contract.
Which I have to agree, Vaughn’s market value despite his recent suspension would be about $550.
Edit. Unless;
If the dogs were to pick him up next year they could very well sign him for $350 as he would be only playing for 2/3rds of the season.
So a wise accountant would make that his first year salary to factor in the time lost in suspension.


Vaughans market value, is what the market will pay for him.....thats kinda how markets work. His "market" value is greatly diminished by his own stupidity.

If the NRL or anyone else have a notional value for him, that is the opposite to Market value.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413221) said:
@needaname said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413189) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413164) said:
@spartan117 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413130) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1413016) said:
The NRL didnt de-register him, they suspended him for 8 matches. When he serves those 8 matches, he can play. Saints sacked him. New club can sign him

The Club that picks him up will own that suspension time...


100% but the post I was referring to said that the NRL wouldnt register him. They never de-registered him and as soon as that suspension is served he can play for who ever.

The poster your referring to is a bit wiser than that.
He would of meant the NRL wouldn’t agree to $350 as a nominal value of Vaughn’s contract.
Which I have to agree, Vaughn’s market value despite his recent suspension would be about $550.
Edit. Unless;
If the dogs were to pick him up next year they could very well sign him for $350 as he would be only playing for 2/3rds of the season.
So a wise accountant would make that his first year salary to factor in the time lost in suspension.


Vaughans market value, is what the market will pay for him.....thats kinda how markets work. His "market" value is greatly diminished by his own stupidity.

If the NRL or anyone else have a notional value for him, that is the opposite to Market value.

Haven’t you kind of said the same thing I just said?
Market value of $550 might be a little low, but would be the low scale of a high profile prop.
- the suspension / impacted value of being suspended would bring his face value down to 400-350k
 
Back
Top