@Abraham said in [Thread closed?](/post/1066453) said:
Try be open minded, and abandon your bias as hard as that might be at first. If you do, you will ultimately end up in a much better place than when you started.
I find comments like this rather ironic. Surely you are aware that a very significant number of atheists and agnostics were raised within a religion, especially those of a decent age where, like myself, the number of publicly non-religious was much smaller last century than it is now.
Myself, I was raised Catholic and went to Church every week until I was 18. I absolutely believed in Jesus and God, went to Catholic schools and did all my sacraments.
Then I became an adult and started to truly think for myself, question what I'd been told, question what I'd been taught. Not just religion, but everything. Age of reason they call it.
And, frankly, IMO Christianity is one of the weakest theories going around. The arguments are weak as dish water and fundamentally rely on faith and non-provable suppositions. Oh, and from a book first drafted two thousand years ago.
So actually I came from bias, I came from the mindset that the Church preaches the truth and God is out there watching. Then I thought about it with a mature and rational mind, read widely in non-religious texts (because I was well-versed in Christian tradition) and decided it was a pretty spurious position to be so absolute about.
Because that's fundamentally the thing for me. There isn't another topic that I am aware of where people agree there is a high measure of potential uncertainty, or at least non-measurability, but believe it heart and soul regardless. I have faith in people I've known, met, judged, associated. Why would I have that faith in God? Never met the bloke, never spoken to me, never revealed any hidden truth, never even sat down for a beer and a chat. Not deserving of my faith; if he truly does exist he's like an absent Dad.