TieDye
Well-known member
@JoshColeman99 said in [Tigers and Storm Player Loan Swap](/post/1125727) said:@balmain-boy said in [Tigers and Storm Player Loan Swap](/post/1125716) said:@TieDye said in [Tigers and Storm Player Loan Swap](/post/1125632) said:@THE_POM said in [Tigers and Storm Player Loan Swap](/post/1125631) said:A player this could effect greatly with Grant coming over is Chee Kam.
Grant comes over & starts as 9 see's the likes of Walters taking a bench/utility role. Something Chee Kam has covered last year, Madge likes having big bodies on the bench, unless Chee Kam could jag a starting spot I see him missing out if Grant makes the move.
Way off, IMO, Reynolds + Liddle suffer massively. Rather MCK off the bench (easily one of our best there) and only one of the three that fills in at centre so that mainly leaves Mbye as cover
I'm with you.
2 props, one back rower (nether garner or LL can play 80) and one utility (no hooker can play 80). Once we have players who can play the full 80 you could add an extra big guy but our forwards are really quite durable as is. Twal can play 50-60. Aloiai 40. Mikaele 40. Musgrove 40-50. We don't need to restrict them to 20 min spurts of pure power and impact.
Garner can play 80. Did it a few times last year to good effect.
Garner/MCK and LL at the very least shores up and locks down two sides of the ruck. One from the bench - Mbye could even slide into a roving 2nd row role and hope not to get concussed.
Think BB above was assuming I’d suggested Madge was looking at playing either two of Reynolds/Walters when you’d have to assume due to salary cap pressure he moves Kev to CC.
Tbh it’s a real toss up for mine and the last big issue between who a replacement lock is and which extra bopper we DO carry once the hooker dilemma is sorted. Liddle could. Grant likely.