Tigers could face ground controversy

@Gary Bakerloo said:
@citizen cub said:
Firstly, you have no idea what your talking about (Leichhardt would give us a psychological advantage and size is not an issue) and secondly are you that lazy you can't spell the word disgusting

I would not be so presumptious. The ground is really not up to standard and it needs a huge amount of work. In reality, the club is only allowed to play there as it was a concession from the NRL for the two clubs to merge. **I don't think Leichhardt is that strong an advantage,** we did not seem to need it in 2005 and the team does not plays any better at either Leichhardt or Campbelltown.

Sure, size is not an issue if we were living in the 1970's and 1980's, but afraid to say, it is 2010 and size does matter.

The players think there is an advantage in playing there. Surely the players are entitled to whatever advantage a true home ground can provide them?
 
I don't think this is an issue any longer after tonight’s performance.

We are no longer in the top four and our fate is no longer in our hands.
 
If it was at Leicchardt Oval, you'd get about 23,000 through the gates and I reckon at least an extra 1000 or so under those fences at the back. That hill would be a very tight place to watch football.

Remember, though, that during the Cowboys, Raiders and Sharks games, we've looked nervous. Maybe Leichhardt freaks the boys out a bit too much.
 
I don't think we will make the top 4 now anyway. We might not even make the top 8\. We need 1 more win out of our last 4 games to get us on 30 points and even that may not be enough with our bad for and against. Our last 4 games are against tough teams.
 
You know what I have changed my mind. Have the home final at Campbelltown Stadium if we make the top 4\. Then have our next home final at Leichhardt Oval, and then keep switching between those 2 grounds. If we have a home final at SFS we lose home ground advantage. An opponent would rather play us at the SFS instead of having to play us at Campbelltown Stadium or Leichhardt Oval. You know it makes sense.
 
@Bismark said:
If it was at Leicchardt Oval, you'd get about 23,000 through the gates and I reckon at least an extra 1000 or so under those fences at the back. That hill would be a very tight place to watch football.

Remember, though, that during the Cowboys, Raiders and Sharks games, we've looked nervous. Maybe Leichhardt freaks the boys out a bit too much.

There was new perimeter fencing installed a few years back, not that ive walked around the joint lately or been down the back, but the fencing looks like itd do the job its meant to do
 
@alien said:
You know what I have changed my mind. Have the home final at Campbelltown Stadium if we make the top 4\. Then have our next home final at Leichhardt Oval, and then keep switching between those 2 grounds. If we have a home final at SFS we lose home ground advantage. An opponent would rather play us at the SFS instead of having to play us at Campbelltown Stadium or Leichhardt Oval. You know it makes sense.

Campbelltown hasn't and won't be mentioned as an option….
 
@TheSunTanSuperman said:
@alien said:
You know what I have changed my mind. Have the home final at Campbelltown Stadium if we make the top 4\. Then have our next home final at Leichhardt Oval, and then keep switching between those 2 grounds. If we have a home final at SFS we lose home ground advantage. An opponent would rather play us at the SFS instead of having to play us at Campbelltown Stadium or Leichhardt Oval. You know it makes sense.

Campbelltown hasn't and won't be mentioned as an option….

Actually it has been. :laughing:
 
It would just feel weird if we got a home final at the SFS and it was against the Roosters. It wouldn't really feel like a home final but atleast none of our supporters would be locked out. Wests vs Manly would have a good atmosphere at the SFS.
 
@alien said:
@TheSunTanSuperman said:
@alien said:
You know what I have changed my mind. Have the home final at Campbelltown Stadium if we make the top 4\. Then have our next home final at Leichhardt Oval, and then keep switching between those 2 grounds. If we have a home final at SFS we lose home ground advantage. An opponent would rather play us at the SFS instead of having to play us at Campbelltown Stadium or Leichhardt Oval. You know it makes sense.

Campbelltown hasn't and won't be mentioned as an option….

Actually it has been. :laughing:

I'm sorry….hasn't been mentioned as an option **BY ANYONE WHO MATTERS!**
 
If we make the top 4, I would pay at th SFS unless the opposition is the Roosters. Otherwise I would play at Campbo or Leichhardt even if our winning record at Campbo is better.
 
@TheSunTanSuperman said:
@alien said:
@TheSunTanSuperman said:
Campbelltown hasn't and won't be mentioned as an option….

Actually it has been. :laughing:

I'm sorry….hasn't been mentioned as an option **BY ANYONE WHO MATTERS!**

Why wouldn't it be considered?

It has far superior facilities, especially from a corporate perspective.
 
@Centaur said:
Why wouldn't it be considered?

It has far superior facilities, especially from a corporate perspective.

100% correct. As mentioned in a previous post, the order should be:

1\. SFS
2\. Campbelltown
3\. Leichhardt

Blow up all you like, the facts are that Leichhardt is not up to standard. I take comments made by players regarding Leichhardt Oval with a grain of salt. Positive comments in the media are required to distract away from the poor corporate facilities at the ground. In addition, positive comments in the press by players attempts to justify the ground's status as a premier sporting venue and in turn puts pressure of the different levels of government to attract funding.

Players used to make similar comments about playing at Campbelltown. They seemed to have stopped now as they don't need to because the ground's future is secure and will only continue to grow in capacity.
 
<big>Plan to play NRL finals back-to-back at SFS and SCG on the same day</big>

THE NRL finals will kick off with a 100,000-fan spectacular under an unprecedented plan to play back-to-back games at the SFS and SCG on the same day.
The Daily Telegraph can reveal the league is keen to play a double-header in week one of the finals at the famous Moore Park venues on Saturday, September 11, if the Wests Tigers and Sydney Roosters finish second and third on the premiership table, which is a distinct possibility.

Both clubs use the SFS as their home ground - the Tigers likely to play a home final at Moore Park rather than suburban grounds Leichhardt or Campbelltown.

Under the historic plan, team three would play team six at 6.30pm on the Saturday at the SFS with sides two and seven clashing at 8.30pm next door at the SCG.

Playing one final at the SFS and the second next door will be discussed further in coming weeks if the Roosters and Tigers continue their current success. The NRL may even consider offering fans a package deal for tickets to both finals.

Nearly 40,000 fans packed the SCG on Sunday to watch an epic match between the Sydney Roosters and St George Illawarra, the Dragons winning 19-12.

"If results should fall that way and the Roosters and Tigers finish second and third, we would obviously hold talks with both clubs about their options and their preferences before confirming the venues," NRL chief operating officer Graham Annesley said. "But clearly the SFS-SCG option on the same night is an attractive one based on the success of last Sunday.

"It would certainly deliver a great double-header event for fans at two of rugby league's most significant venues. With the exception of the Dragons, you can throw a net over the other teams in contention."

Both matches could conceivably be sell-outs, with nearly 100,000 pouring into the Moore Park precinct for the start of the finals.

"The SFS and SCG are ideal venues for NRL finals," said SCG and Sports Ground Trust chief executive Jamie Barkley.

"Given the success of Sunday's blockbuster, you certainly wouldn't rule out a finals game at the SCG.

"Two finals games on the same night would be a wonderful event for rugby league.

"Playing two semi-finals in Moore Park would also be a great advertisement for the game. The SCG is the traditional and spiritual home of rugby league while the SFS was purpose built for rugby league.

"We are blessed to have two great stadiums in the Moore Park area."

Wests Tigers boss Stephen Humphreys said his club would not think about a home final venue until they actually finished in the top four.

"We will see what happens over the next couple of weeks. We don't want to get too far ahead of ourselves," Humphreys said.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/plan-to-play-nrl-finals-back-to-back-at-sfs-and-scg-on-the-same-day/story-e6frexnr-1225903191789" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
That story appeared over a week ago.
IMO, it would be a nightmare. It's hard enough getting in and out of Moore Park when there is one game on. I don't see how it would work with 2, and I can't imagine either club being 'persuaded' to play their home semi at the SCG. Last weekends results make it less likely we will both finish in the top 4 anyway.
 
Back
Top