Time to make the magpie more visible.
- Thread starter tigermaniac
- Start date
GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
@tiger4ever said:
The club are the ones responsible for the merchandise. All Black and Gold, virtually zero White. As WTFL said look at the the stuff you find at Best and Less and any other department store. Look at the wristbands, sweatbands, hats and any other merchandise, The white is non exsistant, and that falls on the club
tiger4ever
Active member
@Cultured Bogan said:
granto -SO i derailed it did i…get lost go away look above and thats before i said anything...like a pack of dogs on me the moment i say something....You just trolled then...unbelievable
Maybe im the only one that refuses to be bullied out of their opinion...look what happened to cqtiger in this post...got slammed because he dared to disagree
Yeah good point gnr4life i have noticed that part but i do have a white hat but that could be 2011 not sure.There must be a reason the club does this.
happy_tiger
Well-known member
The mainly white polos must easily be the best seller
The rest look like garbage ,I think I have only bought 2 non white polos /dress shirts
Both the black 2006 numbers
The rest look like garbage ,I think I have only bought 2 non white polos /dress shirts
Both the black 2006 numbers
cqtiger
Well-known member
@tiger4ever said:
Have I been posting in my sleep? I believe that this is my first post on this topic but I always get slammed when I disagree - which is pretty much always.
nuff said
innsaneink
Well-known member
Haha dont worry CQ some of us here clearly dont have a clue
Joel Helmes
Well-known member
This years members hat sure had a lot of white…
tiger4ever
Active member
@cqtiger said:
lol sorry mate cktiger
Ink your right you know…your the leader of that group
@cktiger said:
Is worth two in the bush?
innsaneink
Well-known member
Ha ha .. just back looking at this thread after a few well deserved beers and nothing has changed!(except for cqtiger getting confused for me)
As I said before , I have accepted the Maggie even though I think it's dopey to have two mascots on our jersey (not sure if the Dragons have a little Steeler man anywhere?)
The Wests side of this argument (well , not everyone) KEEP saying Balmain got EVERYTHING because it is their logo and they were called the tigers (gee , surprising they would have called them that)
Well , what part of 'WestsTigers' do you think doesn't have the word 'Balmain' in it?
Here is a clue… it is the opposite side of 'WestsTigers' that doesn't have the Magpie in it.
We can't be called both and the J/V was kind enough to still put the Maggie somewhere on the jersey ... be happy.
Once again there is zero reference to Balmain (and please don't say it's by association or you just talked your way out of why the Magpie is there).
You don't read countless threads demanding (or even suggesting) for the 'Balmain' inclusion yet every now and then the move the Maggie or make it bigger chorus starts and we all get caught up in it ... ho hum
As I said before , I have accepted the Maggie even though I think it's dopey to have two mascots on our jersey (not sure if the Dragons have a little Steeler man anywhere?)
The Wests side of this argument (well , not everyone) KEEP saying Balmain got EVERYTHING because it is their logo and they were called the tigers (gee , surprising they would have called them that)
Well , what part of 'WestsTigers' do you think doesn't have the word 'Balmain' in it?
Here is a clue… it is the opposite side of 'WestsTigers' that doesn't have the Magpie in it.
We can't be called both and the J/V was kind enough to still put the Maggie somewhere on the jersey ... be happy.
Once again there is zero reference to Balmain (and please don't say it's by association or you just talked your way out of why the Magpie is there).
You don't read countless threads demanding (or even suggesting) for the 'Balmain' inclusion yet every now and then the move the Maggie or make it bigger chorus starts and we all get caught up in it ... ho hum
@GNR4LIFE said:
one of our jerseys this year was almost completely white, and as helmsey pointed out, so was the members hat. i would've thought that best and less and other stores would order the tigers merchandise that they think will sell better, and if they think that that is the non-white stuff than that's not really WT fault
@cktiger said:
\
@cktiger said:
Yes.
I must be new here as im sure ive read and commented on this before (not this type of thread but this very same topic-the magpie). I, and I would guess/hope the majority of WT supporters have no issue with it being there. It's been there since day dot. But to argue on the size and/or placement of it is itself inherently divisive (word of the day) and just IMO a tad childish. It was on the sleeve on the original jerseys so that's where it should be and whatever size it was should be the same. If it has gotten smaller than it should be restored to what it was.
Yes, I went for balmain before the jv but always admired and readily accepted the maggies when we married, there wasnt many other teams I could say that about. Maybe the feeling isn't mutual but I can't change that. I agree with the sentiments above but only ever think about it when it is dragged up on here.
As I stated in a very similar thread I dont know if the old magpies boys and gals will ever be pleased, even in this thread it's jumped from the Maggie to the amount of white. Balmain lost out of the jv too, many things, but I never looked back and don't want to. Im a wests tigers man now and forever
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
@cktiger said:
\
@cktiger said:
Yes.
I must be new here as im sure ive read and commented on this before (not this type of thread but this very same topic-the magpie). I, and I would guess/hope the majority of WT supporters have no issue with it being there. It's been there since day dot. But to argue on the size and/or placement of it is itself inherently divisive (word of the day) and just IMO a tad childish. It was on the sleeve on the original jerseys so that's where it should be and whatever size it was should be the same. If it has gotten smaller than it should be restored to what it was.
Yes, I went for balmain before the jv but always admired and readily accepted the maggies when we married, there wasnt many other teams I could say that about. Maybe the feeling isn't mutual but I can't change that. I agree with the sentiments above but only ever think about it when it is dragged up on here.
As I stated in a very similar thread I dont know if the old magpies boys and gals will ever be pleased, even in this thread it's jumped from the Maggie to the amount of white. Balmain lost out of the jv too, many things, but I never looked back and don't want to. Im a wests tigers man now and forever
\
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
tigermaniac
Well-known member
@Justo said:
Like so many others, you completely miss the point. Who said the team should be called/ referred to as the magpies? Ive never seen equality in our merger, so to me these are interesting times ahead with the WSDRLFC developments. Have a lovely day.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
tigerbenji
Well-known member
Gee this is interesting - not.
GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
@steve-o said:
What about those Lote hair braid things? those lounge chair seats they have on the sidelines? There might be some White merchandise out there, but it really is few and far between
@GNR4LIFE said:
The Lote hair braids? It's come to that has it? Good grief…