TPA's

[cqtiger]

I am first to admit that I know very little about third party agreements. I believe that they must not have any formal or official involvement with that club.

So, to me, that means that those people can only have one TPA with a club, ever. Otherwise, wouldn't it be logical to assume that if the same people offer TPA's more than once to a club then they are therefore "connected" to that club?

How then can the rich clubs keep coming up with TPA's?

Just saying.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

 

[happy_tiger]

CQ the best advice I got was to type in salary cap NRL

The NRL.com dumbs it down really well ,even for us CQers

Even I understood it

 

[Winnipeg]

What I would like to know is this…

If TPAs are supposed to be independent from the club and not reliant on the player signing with that particular club, what is stopping a player breaking his contract with the club but keeping his third party cash?

To explain... Fifita for example. Say he signed with the Dogs for 800k a year, 400 from the club and 400 TPA. After three months of 2015 he says he is having personal problems and wants a release from the bulldogs... his third party deals can’t turn around and say ‘well if you’re gone from the Doggies, you are gone from us as well’.

Could it possibly happen like that?

 

[Black_n_White]

Winipeg the theory will be truly tested very soon with the whole Broncos salary cap investigation. Milford was given a 3rd party house and land package supposedly to go to Brisbane, if the contract falls through which it may well do, Milford would still be legally entitled to the house otherwise it wouldnt be a legal TPA, thus a further breach of salary cap by the Broncos.

 

[Winnipeg]

Jeez, a free house outside of the salary cap… what a joke

Not much use Canberra offering him a house in Brissy to sign with them lol

 

[happy_tiger]

Teddy got a free car at Canberra (which is allowable under the salary cap )

 

[cqtiger]

Winipeg the theory will be truly tested very soon with the whole Broncos salary cap investigation. Milford was given a 3rd party house and land package supposedly to go to Brisbane, if the contract falls through which it may well do, Milford would still be legally entitled to the house otherwise it wouldnt be a legal TPA, thus a further breach of salary cap by the Broncos.

Now you know what we are always up against.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

 

[hobbo]

Teddy got a free car at Canberra (which is allowable under the salary cap )

I would've given him my old hilux if I knew that was the deciding factor in his decision to go !

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

 

[Black_n_White]

Winipeg the theory will be truly tested very soon with the whole Broncos salary cap investigation. Milford was given a 3rd party house and land package supposedly to go to Brisbane, if the contract falls through which it may well do, Milford would still be legally entitled to the house otherwise it wouldnt be a legal TPA, thus a further breach of salary cap by the Broncos.

Now you know what we are always up against.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

I always knew…. my uncle was a NRL CEO. Actually probably ARL.. same difference.