Mainly because most of it's subjective, long-bow drawing, biased rhetoric. It's catastrophising, hyperbolic, inaccurate, coercive nonsense.
It's also the one-sided analysis for me. Have the Dem noms never lied? Did Dem senators not call for 'no justice, no peace' during the BLM riots?
Do direct quotes matter anymore?
'I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard. '
That was the DIRECT quote re; Jan 6th. This has been done to death. That is objectively, irrefutably and importantly, a call for peaceful protest and the right to assemble.
To say anything else is a perception and, generally, one grounded in bias.
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is not Hitler.
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is not a fascist.
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is not a 'threat to democracy'.
These are all Dem-promoted falsehoods. You critiquing those, too?
I do not like the way Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon goes about his business, nor do I think he represents a model citizen or bastion for democracy in The West, but he speaks to an everyman that is tired of being censored, manipulated and demonised for their varied views, are tired of having propaganda shoved down their throat in the name of diversity and equity and, generally, would like to be left alone to live their lives in a country that prioritises their own countrymen.
Like it or not, a great proportion of US citizens are tired of the Democrats' weak immigration policies, their attacks on masculinity and the general feeling of everything being shit in their country.
They have a right to vote for a candidate that they feel will have their best interests at heart and not be called 'garbage' for daring to disagree with who they're being told they SHOULD vote for.
