A
alien
Guest
@Icon said:i for one would just like to move on and follow the Wests Tigers.
No one is stopping you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Icon said:i for one would just like to move on and follow the Wests Tigers.
@Magpie Magic said:@crouching_tiger said:Now with that fossil Hammond out of the picture, i believe everything can move forward now. Stack the BRET team as a unified WT State Cup feeder, kick the Magpies out of the State Cup and send them off to Bundy Cup and they can be the feeder for BRET. This is the way it should always have been.
Just wondering why most of the biased stuff comes from the Balmain side of the JV.
Do a lot of the Balmain supporters really believe the Wests Tigers belong to them.
Maybe,the Wests side can give them their juniors and money and clubs and they can call the Wests Tigers Balmain again. :imp:
Lets not forget that Wests and Balmain own and control the WT so its not about moving on.We are the shareholders and we want it our way.
As a Western Suburbs Magpies supporter of the Wests Tigers I feel the Joint Venture is fair and equal but not properly expressed in the media and by some Balmain fans.
I'm sick of the media comming up with crap like black and gold when our colours also include white etc.
@alien said:@Icon said:i for one would just like to move on and follow the Wests Tigers.
No one is stopping you.
@Icon said:@alien said:@Icon said:i for one would just like to move on and follow the Wests Tigers.
No one is stopping you.
So the way you look at the situation, is it about what's best for the wests tigers or wests magpies?
because whenever any discussion comes back to wests v balmain you get all Magpie…, you've even just changed your avatar to make a point.., it's no different to the pro balmain crew on here.
@Icon said:@alien said:@Icon said:i for one would just like to move on and follow the Wests Tigers.
No one is stopping you.
So the way you look at the situation, is it about what's best for the wests tigers or wests magpies?
because whenever any discussion comes back to wests v balmain you get all Magpie…, you've even just changed your avatar to make a point.., it's no different to the pro balmain crew on here.
@KingOvKingz09 said:… and the media says BLACK & GOLD because they dont really include white as a colour... i dont see a problem with black & gold (black representing wests and gold representing balmain is the way i see it)...
@alien said:@Icon said:So the way you look at the situation, is it about what's best for the wests tigers or wests magpies?
because whenever any discussion comes back to wests v balmain you get all Magpie…, you've even just changed your avatar to make a point.., it's no different to the pro balmain crew on here.
I reckon it's also best for Wests Tigers to have 2 feeder teams. More space to keep juniors that are too old for the 20's next year is one reason.
@Geo. said:@alien said:@Icon said:So the way you look at the situation, is it about what's best for the wests tigers or wests magpies?
because whenever any discussion comes back to wests v balmain you get all Magpie…, you've even just changed your avatar to make a point.., it's no different to the pro balmain crew on here.
I reckon it's also best for Wests Tigers to have 2 feeder teams. More space to keep juniors that are too old for the 20's next year is one reason.
Oh dear….How many State Cup players have cracked FG this year....The emergence of the Under 20's is exactly why they want a Wests Tigers team....
My guess is it will be made up of graduated 20's players like Corby. Curran, Shirnack Jnr, those graduating like Clarke x2, Hyland etc plus any fringe 20's players as well as contracted Top 25 Wests Tigers players not currently in the 17.....
I love the Magpies and they will always have a place in my heart.....but it's what's best for the Wests Tigers and then maybe we can get some rationalisation of State Cup and bring it back as a true reserve grade....
You know it makes sense!!!!!!!
@Gobbs said:The marketing tool of the 'Tiger' was seen as far more enticing compared to a Black and White native Australian bird that was the image of the Western Suburbs Football Club. It was perceived that to ensure that the 'Wests Tigers' product was attractive it had to be threatening, ferocious and appealing to the young generation coming through that could identify with a strong, dominat animal that would defeat it's rivals.
@KingOvKingz09 said:YOU TELL EM DARTH GEO !!!! :smiling_imp: :smiling_imp: :smiling_imp: :smiling_imp:
@alien said:@KingOvKingz09 said:YOU TELL EM DARTH GEO !!!! :smiling_imp: :smiling_imp: :smiling_imp: :smiling_imp:
You have turned to the dark side KingOvKingz. I have failed you.
@Ken Y said:Alien pull your head in u goose.
Why do you think Parra wanted the merger with Balmain initially. Ask any marketing professional to compare the magpie to the tiger. The tiger is by far and away the more bankable motif. I recon u should just go to bed otherwise you'll be late to school.
@alien said:If we have to have 1 feeder club then call it the Wests Magpies and let Wests Ashfield fund it since they have the cash to do so. It's not their fault Balmain can't afford their own team.