@JoshColeman99 said in [Wests Tigers V NZ Warriors Trial \*Live Thread\.\.](/post/1123585) said:
There’s no defending Nofa there mate. Regardless of a 3 on 2 rushing up past the ball and tackling no one is a poor play. He needs to stay in the defensive line and slide across, much bigger chance of defending the try doing that And Joey didn’t look happy with him after it.
We'll have to agree to disagree. I'm afraid you can't just say "regardless of a 3 on 2" as if it doesn't matter. It's first grade - a team with a 3 on 2 overlap should score. There was an overlap from the play the ball and all the winger can do is try to take an intercept or spoil the final pass. If he slides out they score on the inside.
Blaming the winger when there's an overlap is like blaming the number 11 batsmen when the middle order have failed.
I don't understand why people still seem happy to do it even when it can be demonstrated to be not the case.
Nofa had a choice, stay in the line, or rush up. He rushed up to take the man one in, and that resulted in the cut out pass. Who knows what would have happened if he stayed in the line, maybe they slide successfully, maybe they don't.
Thank you for the work you put in to demonstrate what happened, but there you did not (you could not) demonstrate what happened if he didn't run up. We can't know for sure. Generally I feel if you run up out of the line (at any time), you must make the tackle. If not, well, you leave a hole, and you make the chance they will score a try much greater.
I'm on your side of the fence.
1. I think we can agree there was an overlap regardless
2. In this situation, a player has 2 choices. Slide or rush the attacker/receiving player
3. When you rush, it lowers the chances of successfully defending the overlap
Nofo made the low percentage play in that situation and probably should have stayed on his wing.