The_Old_Fox
Active member
I have a feeling Tyson Gamble might be the answer in 2018 if the running man pulls another hami next year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:I know hes an absolute muppet but Moses looks the better half albeit playing in a better team right now, but perhaps we should have cut Brooks free and kept Moses. Obviously there's reason's for why we did what we did seeing as though im not privy to them i can only call it how i see it, Brooks $550 Moses $750 theres a bigger gulf in class than $200k.
@ said:I have a feeling Tyson Gamble might be the answer in 2018 if the running man pulls another hami next year.
@ said:@ said:I have a feeling Tyson Gamble might be the answer in 2018 if the running man pulls another hami next year.
What a stupid bloody comment. How many games have you seen Tyson Gamble play??
@ said:Take a good look at Cleary, then take a good look at Brooks, and then tell us that Brooks is improving, much as I'd like there to be an improvement in him, there isn't one. He's not a rookie any more, but still plays like one
@ said:@ said:@ said:I have a feeling Tyson Gamble might be the answer in 2018 if the running man pulls another hami next year.
What a stupid bloody comment. How many games have you seen Tyson Gamble play??
You may have to eat your comments next year, for starters if Brooks gets injured Gamble or Marshall will have to replace him, whats so stupid about that, please explain your comment?
@ said:Here we go again. I'll try to explain again.
Cleary is a better player than Brooks. The fact that Cleary is playing awesome at 19/20 has nothing to do with whether Brooks is improving or not.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:I have a feeling Tyson Gamble might be the answer in 2018 if the running man pulls another hami next year.
What a stupid bloody comment. How many games have you seen Tyson Gamble play??
You may have to eat your comments next year, for starters if Brooks gets injured Gamble or Marshall will have to replace him, whats so stupid about that, please explain your comment?
I do have other things in my life so I can't sit all day and waste time on this site.
But to answer your question.
First- if Brooks is unavailable for whatever reason Marshall would almost certainly come in on experience alone.
Second- Tyson Gamble has been bought on POTENTIAL, first thing he has to do on arrival is prove himself.
Third- When Brooks resign for a further 2 years just about everyone on this site applauded.
Fourth- please let me know what Brooks is doing that is so wrong it beats me.
Fifth- As I've said a few times, why don't you and other Brooks critics go down to Concord and have a run, you obviously know what's required to be an NRL halfback.
@ said:@ said:I have a feeling Tyson Gamble might be the answer in 2018 if the running man pulls another hami next year.
What a stupid bloody comment. How many games have you seen Tyson Gamble play??
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:I have a feeling Tyson Gamble might be the answer in 2018 if the running man pulls another hami next year.
What a stupid bloody comment. How many games have you seen Tyson Gamble play??
You may have to eat your comments next year, for starters if Brooks gets injured Gamble or Marshall will have to replace him, whats so stupid about that, please explain your comment?
I do have other things in my life so I can't sit all day and waste time on this site.
But to answer your question.
First- if Brooks is unavailable for whatever reason Marshall would almost certainly come in on experience alone.
Second- Tyson Gamble has been bought on POTENTIAL, first thing he has to do on arrival is prove himself.
Third- When Brooks resign for a further 2 years just about everyone on this site applauded.
Fourth- please let me know what Brooks is doing that is so wrong it beats me.
Fifth- As I've said a few times, why don't you and other Brooks critics go down to Concord and have a run, you obviously know what's required to be an NRL halfback.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:What a stupid bloody comment. How many games have you seen Tyson Gamble play??
You may have to eat your comments next year, for starters if Brooks gets injured Gamble or Marshall will have to replace him, whats so stupid about that, please explain your comment?
I do have other things in my life so I can't sit all day and waste time on this site.
But to answer your question.
First- if Brooks is unavailable for whatever reason Marshall would almost certainly come in on experience alone.
Second- Tyson Gamble has been bought on POTENTIAL, first thing he has to do on arrival is prove himself.
Third- When Brooks resign for a further 2 years just about everyone on this site applauded.
Fourth- please let me know what Brooks is doing that is so wrong it beats me.
Fifth- As I've said a few times, why don't you and other Brooks critics go down to Concord and have a run, you obviously know what's required to be an NRL halfback.
You need to read my comment again, I said if Brooks get injured, "meaning"…. Brooks will be first option at the 7 next year, I wasn't putting him down but he's having problems with his hami..
2\. Gamble might be an answer.." meaning" I'm not saying his better than Brooks but if that potential you are referring to peaks next year, then it's possible he could hold a spot in first grade and surprise everyone..THAT IS NOT A BLOODY STUPID COMMENT..
3\. It's not a given that Marshall rolls straight into the 7 if Brooks is injured, he may still use him from the bench who knows.
Brooks might be the worse no 7 in the game right now, if not..he'd probably be in the bottom 3..this is a good scenario for Gamble to be facing if his trying to make a name for himself..I don't mind logical reply's or a sensible counter argument, but sweeping insults are not necessary especially if they are not warranted.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:You may have to eat your comments next year, for starters if Brooks gets injured Gamble or Marshall will have to replace him, whats so stupid about that, please explain your comment?
I do have other things in my life so I can't sit all day and waste time on this site.
But to answer your question.
First- if Brooks is unavailable for whatever reason Marshall would almost certainly come in on experience alone.
Second- Tyson Gamble has been bought on POTENTIAL, first thing he has to do on arrival is prove himself.
Third- When Brooks resign for a further 2 years just about everyone on this site applauded.
Fourth- please let me know what Brooks is doing that is so wrong it beats me.
Fifth- As I've said a few times, why don't you and other Brooks critics go down to Concord and have a run, you obviously know what's required to be an NRL halfback.
You need to read my comment again, I said if Brooks get injured, "meaning"…. Brooks will be first option at the 7 next year, I wasn't putting him down but he's having problems with his hami..
2\. Gamble might be an answer.." meaning" I'm not saying his better than Brooks but if that potential you are referring to peaks next year, then it's possible he could hold a spot in first grade and surprise everyone..THAT IS NOT A BLOODY STUPID COMMENT..
3\. It's not a given that Marshall rolls straight into the 7 if Brooks is injured, he may still use him from the bench who knows.
Brooks might be the worse no 7 in the game right now, if not..he'd probably be in the bottom 3..this is a good scenario for Gamble to be facing if his trying to make a name for himself..I don't mind logical reply's or a sensible counter argument, but sweeping insults are not necessary especially if they are not warranted.
Dont bother Fox. You are arguing with a butthurt shill. You can not reason with that type.