Club_Sandwich
New member
Was just reading an article regarding the Knights signing Shaun Kenny-Dowall and it mentioned that he was released by the Roosters after being convicted of possessing cocaine.
My question is, why didn't the Tigers show the same no tolerance approach and release Lovett when he was convicted?
SKD had in his possession 0.29g of cocaine.
Lovett had 0.39g.
Lovett is not even FG standard either, at least the Roosters could have been justified in keeping SKD because he was half decent and had actually performed well in the past.
The only thing I can think of is that SKD was on his last strike due to past transgressions.
Can anyone shed any light on this? I like this no nonsense approach by the Rorters. These guys are meant to be role models and should know better.
I would think (not that we should) that a team bends the rules for their star players, not their crap ones.
My question is, why didn't the Tigers show the same no tolerance approach and release Lovett when he was convicted?
SKD had in his possession 0.29g of cocaine.
Lovett had 0.39g.
Lovett is not even FG standard either, at least the Roosters could have been justified in keeping SKD because he was half decent and had actually performed well in the past.
The only thing I can think of is that SKD was on his last strike due to past transgressions.
Can anyone shed any light on this? I like this no nonsense approach by the Rorters. These guys are meant to be role models and should know better.
I would think (not that we should) that a team bends the rules for their star players, not their crap ones.