Wonder if They handed things over how things would look now, a sliding door moment. On one hand I like the idea of privatisation. It removes any committees, whether it's a boardroom or any other that run a club in doing that there's no more infighting, no more leaks to the media to undermine the coach or other board members. The owner chooses a direction and the club heads that way.
The reason I'm against it is because it can go south pretty bad, if the owner hasn't got a clue they could potentially destroy the club. No club should be anyone's plaything because they have money.
On the whole I would prefer the Tigers to be a privatised organisation. Reason being we are on the negative end of having a boardroom. Our board are dysfunctional, have no clue about league, constantly at issue with each other and literally have carte Blanche because they cannot be held to account for any of it.