Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

[weststigerman]

May as well have Benji lace up the boots.

 

[Fade.To.Black]

May as well have Benji lace up the boots.

Seriously, he couldn't be any worse. At least he'd have a kicking game which is what we're needing more than anything.

 

[426Tlgerland]

Pearce This year and next would be good for us , he is better than both Wakeman and Brooks , Great footy brain and we have a good pack , he would win you games , and I think he would even be better than Hastings , Newcastle we’re average when he was there , we have better players hear than they had

 

[weststigerman]

This club has no idea what they’re doing. Had they played Hastings at 7 like they should have from the start we wouldn’t be making these desperate decisions.

 

[vlad]

Why would pearce get 750k a year when he literally has no other options ?

 

[The Fresh Oil]

So get rid of Hastings.
Keep Brooks.
Partner Brooks with AD. Turns shit.
Partner Brooks with rookie. Turns shit.
Go to SL and sign 34 year old ( for 2 years lol) to partner brooks. Spoiler…turns shit.


Trust the process lol. Bunch of incompetent clowns. How can one club attract such atrocious management? The odds of having so many morons in one place must be astronomical.

 

[wet tiger coloured bird]

hasting is better than brooks pearce is better than hasting

 

[Demps]

So get rid of Hastings.
Keep Brooks.
Partner Brooks with AD. Turns shit.
Partner Brooks with rookie. Turns shit.
Go to SL and sign 34 year old ( for 2 years lol) to partner brooks. Spoiler…turns shit.


Trust the process lol. Bunch of incompetent clowns. How can one club attract such atrocious management? The odds of having so many morons in one place must be astronomical.

Hoping Brooks = out.

Admit the failure and call it a day.
Superleague awaits.

 

[Bones]

That would be an absolute disaster, but I reckon the tigers will do it. He's too old and wasn't good when he left.

Pros - Isn’t Luke Brooks

Cons - Nil

 

[watersider]

I'm hoping The_Pom steps in and announces Pearce so that it doesn't happen.

 

[watersider]

Pros - Isn’t Luke Brooks

Cons - Nil

Compelling argument and it's tempting, but I think you'll find that he'll turn out to be Mitchell Pearce.

 

[wet tiger coloured bird]

doesn't cost a cent if we give em brooks money

 

[loklok]

Hoping Brooks = out.

Admit the failure and call it a day.
Superleague awaits.

Brooks and Pearce swap?

 

[The Fresh Oil]

Hoping Brooks = out.

Admit the failure and call it a day.
Superleague awaits.

Literally the only upside is no brooks.

It just shows they went into the season expecting something different from Brooks than they’d seen for the last decade. Insane.

Plan B was , she’ll be right mate. See how it goes.

 

[TigerNeddyK]

I’d love Mitchell to come here and play halfback… with the pack he has to work with it could be an absolute genius move

 

[TigerTone]

(W)asting
(E)very
(S)alary cap
(T)rying
(S)tupidly

(T)o
(I)nject
(G)reatness but
(E)nding up
(R)eally
(S)ad

 

[Tiger_Fanatic3]

Kent says Tigers; $1.5m Pearce play ‘stinks of desperation’. This is why he could ‘transform them’

What happened to five-year plan? Tigers’ $1.5m Pearce play slammed as an act of ‘desperation’

www.foxsports.com.au

Apparently we're prepared to offer 1.5m for 2 years. A lot of coin for a 34 year old who has been out of the NRL for a few years. A sign of desperation.

It'd be a more baffling move than re-signing brooks to another million dollar contract.

Lock up your dogs!

 

[Betterdays22]

Why would pearce get 750k a year when he literally has no other options ?

Would probably take that much to pry him away from the South of France to come to this rabble. Absolutely no incentive to leave, he's probably living the life outside the spotlight in a beautiful part of the world.

 

[Tiger-ferret]

Why would pearce get 750k a year when he literally has no other options ?

Gotta spend our excess coin somehow

 

[Don Kershane]

I thought the dogs would appeal to him.