Bigscreentv
Well-known member
He understands that, but you're ignoring the purpose of this from a Wests perspective.
It may (minorly) weaken our squad in the now, but it vastly strengthens our cap situation now and into the future, which is the purpose.
The discussion about the gap between Joffa and his likely long-term replacement in Blore in open for debate, but I think that gap is being overblown, as is the point as to whether we really lose that much on the field at all, considering Joe's role this year from the bench.
'strengthens our competitors team'
In my opinion, if you wanna talk bad business, holding an inflated bench player contract, simply to spite another team (and in the process eating your own cap away) is the very definition of bad business.
I love Joffa and all he brought to the club, but this situation is mutually beneficial, whether people agree with it or not.
I agree - I like Joe too, but I don't think we lose that much that we can't replace with a younger player. We also need to keep Tupou, Bula, Toa, Matamua, James...There's also guys in Flegg that will be fed in to first grade over the next 1-2 years.
I feel for Joe though as he didn't really get a chance to feel success at the Tigers.