No one else has snapped up Brooks.
That is the truth.
That is the truth.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree, I think that's a fair value of what he brings all things considered.good analysis. the cap is expected to increase even further next year which could drive Brooks’ percentage down even further. I think $750k at max is probably fair and I’d be fairly confident Brooksy would take that. the club has stuck by him throughout his slump, and now he’s coming out the other side. it’s a good deal for all parties.
If we were to retain Brooks ($650) and somehow nab Hunt ($1m) both for two years, that would make us a top 8 side. And if we were to grab Latu Fainu, he will take over in 2026, plus fill in for injuries before then (with Wakeham), we will be well on the way. Two big gets for us on the opposite side of the spectrum but would be a coup. Fingers crossed...
No one else has snapped up Brooks.
That is the truth.
Don't get what the forums obsession with Taafe is... from the games I've seen him play he's average at best. He was in the Souths system long before Lachy Ilias yet Ilias leapfrogged him to the starting 7 role... tells you all you need to know.
No one else has snapped up Brooks.
That is the truth.
Hunt is contracted to end of 25.If we were to retain Brooks ($650) and somehow nab Hunt ($1m) both for two years, that would make us a top 8 side. And if we were to grab Latu Fainu, he will take over in 2026, plus fill in for injuries before then (with Wakeham), we will be well on the way. Two big gets for us on the opposite side of the spectrum but would be a coup. Fingers crossed...
We have to stop buying players that don't "fit" into a position.I still don't want to pay overs for Brooks. I think it'd be good for him to stay as well. Doueihi was a puss contract for us though. He isn't at Mbye or Reynolds level but worse than Brooks by far. It's not a good comparison point.
And who knows the correct figures?Some of the figures posted reflect the emotive nature of the Brooks issue on this forum.
Brooks is one of the few genuine halves available which pretty much destroys your qualification - at the right value. We need him, our club is well aware of it and no doubt his manager as well He has proven over the years he is a loyal type.These are my retention priorities for the next few months (the ones off-contract in '24 can be signed by other clubs from Nov-1):
Luke Brooks (23) - only due to necessity at the right value to lock away one part of our halves puzzle for 24.
Stefano Utoikamanu (24)
Api Korisau (24) - hopefully a one-year extension to rotate with Da Silva in '25.
Junior Tupou (24)
Starford T'oa (24)
Charlie Staines (23)
Brandon Wakeham (23) - ideal backup half
Would rather run an unknown up and coming Junior that buy the Dogs problemhere is an idea.... let's not sign Brooks and run with wakeham and flannagan for next year.... lol
Simply have to sign Brooks out of the Unsigned Players on that list good grief
Problem is getting a 6 or 7 to partner him.
People here are convinced he’ll play for less
- they’re dead set lying to themselves…
Exactly so why post them,And who knows the correct figures?
Very few
well next year Flanagan ain't dogs problemWould rather run an unknown up and coming Junior that buy the Dogs problem
Yes surely, you can't carry that many halves in the top 30 when you add in Johnson, Walker & Tavita Harris.well next year Flanagan ain't dogs problem
surely one of volkman, Martin or Metcalfe will leave the Warriors
I’m starting to think Roosters judgement ain’t that crash hot. Junior Pauga case in pointToo many guys with low footy IQ and he’s one of them. When Roosters let a young guy go, there’s a reason.
No he is saying Brooks has been free to sign with any club since November 1 last year, and he hasn't been signedWhat are you talking about? he's had options including the Storm and Knights. The bloke stayed because he loved the Tigers from an early age. Don't play it off as a negative.
The good halves control the gameCorrect! To think that only one player in the team controls the other 25 players is a fictitious concept.