Tucker
Well-known member
How would that happen?Probably had a deal done at Parra at the same time Moses changed his contract
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How would that happen?Probably had a deal done at Parra at the same time Moses changed his contract
How would that happen?
Good godSo moving forward hopefully we get some news about a few extensions.
Doueihi - 2 years
Naden - 1 year
Mason - 2 years
Luke Luailli - 2 years
Sukkar - Activate the Club Option for 2026 & add 2027
Toa & Da Silva extend until 2028. They are contracted for 2026 already.
The makes 25 on the books for the top 30.
No other real regular first graders missing.
All should be pretty good value except for maybe Doueihi, Toa & Da Silva will have to pay market value. Maybe overs for Da Silva slightly.
5 spots plus plenty in the bank can target at least 2 big names IMO.
It's your overall positivity I appreciate the most.Good god
Thank goodness you're not associated with the club.
None of those players have done anything what so to warrant a new contract. We got into this mess my handing out undeserved contracts to nobodies like Naden.
We have lots of poor quality depth players currently, we need to be aiming much higher. We need forwards to ban bust the line. Backs who can run the length of the field without getting caught. We need to recruit externally, Laulilii and Mason may get new deals. Luke first, Mason is a 14, and we have tal for that role. Potentially Haywood in a year or two too.
Realistically Luke and Mason are still 18 months away from first grade standard and should not be on top 30 deals. Sukkar would be 2-3 years minimum from first grade. Naden and Doueihi are fringe first graders, the ones you sign at the last minute if you can't get anyone better.
Several reasons they had to put an offer to him now.I understand the risk, but Richo’s job is to find a way to get the deal done. I don’t think this approach had much chance of succeeding.
That all makes sense but this is a special case. The kid hasn’t been impressed with the club up until now, his manager hates the joint and holds grudges and his father likes the thought of him elsewhere.Several reasons they had to put an offer to him now.
1. They could still upgrade him this year. So a further financial incentive if he had resigned.
2. You wait til the end of the season the player is definitely going to the market as November 1 would be only a month away.
3. There has been media speculation over his contract since round 1. You do not want this circus to happen on the eve of the semis if we are in a position to make it.
4. The contract being 1mil, has a huge effect on recruitment and retention.
the kid is a dog imo , He left us with 20months leverage in the work place .Should we buy DCE or RenyoldsThat all makes sense but this is a special case. The kid hasn’t been impressed with the club up until now, his manager hates the joint and holds grudges and his father likes the thought of him elsewhere.
Trying it on now left us with no leverage. Had we had a successful season with him thoroughly enjoying his connections as well as seeing what the vision is first hand, we may have turned his head. When you leave yourself open to failure, it generally occurs. Anyway, it doesn’t matter now. Cats out of the bag and the season is affected anyhow.
Two pointsI agree he'd be more likely to re-sign if we're more successful this year, but there's no certainty he will change his mind and his history of release requests and carry on probably gave Richo a sense it wasn't ever happening. They've probably had enough conversations with family and player to understand that.
You just don't want the club dragged through an even bigger mess after investing another season in a raw Galvin in the halves when he doesn't even want to be here.
Get an offer in, even if it means you're less likely to have it accepted, and stop the stupid games and commotion that Moses tries at clubs. Keep in mind they were already at it only last year with release requests, rumours and big media circus. It's just an unnecessary ticking time bomb waiting to happen. Now the direction of club and player is clear and if Moses starts commotion there's no bargaining chip to use against the club.
I think it's unusual for this to all be done so early, but the club has to make decisions about their future halves, it's too critical to put off with contracts and players futures all interconnected. Like keeping doueihi now seems much more important where we were rumoured to be offering him to st George in the offseason.
So I get your point, that patience makes it more likely, but that was probably extremely unlikely, especially if luai and Galvin weren't gelling, so it's right that the club made a decision now. You only have to look back to Mitchell Moses to see what dragging this out can look like.
Bwecause my dwaddy goes for pawamattaSo what’s the real reason?
Are they making him the top earner in the comp?
It’s a baffling decision unless he’s getting a massive increase from what Richo offered. To that point, they didn’t even negotiate and try and get that offer raised.
It doesn’t make any sense other than he completely hates being a Wests Tiger. If that’s the case, why hasn’t that been identified earlier?
I doubt this very muchFor what its worth , he was also spotted at the cafe in Belmore
with Isaac Moses and Phil Gould.
A work mate's son is a regular there and he seen the three of them
having coffee and a chat.
'Geez, tough marker!Good god
Thank goodness you're not associated with the club.
None of those players have done anything what so to warrant a new contract. We got into this mess my handing out undeserved contracts to nobodies like Naden.
We have lots of poor quality depth players currently, we need to be aiming much higher. We need forwards to ban bust the line. Backs who can run the length of the field without getting caught. We need to recruit externally, Laulilii and Mason may get new deals. Luke first, Mason is a 14, and we have tal for that role. Potentially Haywood in a year or two too.
Realistically Luke and Mason are still 18 months away from first grade standard and should not be on top 30 deals. Sukkar would be 2-3 years minimum from first grade. Naden and Doueihi are fringe first graders, the ones you sign at the last minute if you can't get anyone better.
@Tucker Tuck, I think this was a cultural issue. I don’t think he even liked our place before Luai, Turuva and May. Add these big characters, to something he didn’t like, and from I can tell, a bright star is still a square peg. I think we knew this, made an offer he wasn’t going to accept, the whole thing blew up into a 4 day media circus, Now it’s done. We can focus on others and who knows …Another reason to have waited.
It’s in the clubs best interest to commence discussions with a player before they go on the open market, I also think they knew that he was only a slim chance of staying if that, by making a solid offer before hand it shows we are interested but doesn’t allow us to be used as leverage. What I don’t think the club anticipated is the coaching grievances and the leak to the media and the subsequent player reaction to Galvin.You realise Richardson played a big role in this?
There’s no reason this couldn’t wait until November, when we hopefully would have had more data to use in our negotiations. Talking after we played finals would have changed perceptions a bit.
Probably wouldn’t have made a difference, but it may have.
This is all based on the premise that we were a chance of keeping him which I think is evident from his and managers actions was never going to happen.That all makes sense but this is a special case. The kid hasn’t been impressed with the club up until now, his manager hates the joint and holds grudges and his father likes the thought of him elsewhere.
Trying it on now left us with no leverage. Had we had a successful season with him thoroughly enjoying his connections as well as seeing what the vision is first hand, we may have turned his head. When you leave yourself open to failure, it generally occurs. Anyway, it doesn’t matter now. Cats out of the bag and the season is affected anyhow.
They've tried to pull him out of the club multiple times for multiple "reasons".You realise Richardson played a big role in this?
There’s no reason this couldn’t wait until November, when we hopefully would have had more data to use in our negotiations. Talking after we played finals would have changed perceptions a bit.
Probably wouldn’t have made a difference, but it may have.
We’ll have to go low to get him, he’s a grublet's smash nephew moses into the ground, on his maybe return
If we do that - instant penalty for crowding, not square or some rule interpretation previously unheard of, that isn't in the book but Anusely just happens to conveniently pull out of his anus.The eye test tells you we’re losing the battle at the ruck. Watch Melbourne next time they play and watch what they do when the attacking player is getting to his feet. They take away about 6 inches of his space and make subtle contact with his upper body. It probably equates to about half a second. When they get up to play the ball themselves they walk forward or to the side of the marker.
It’s subtle but they get away with it.
Understand your point regarding data. But that could be worse data. and by all reports camp Galvin said don't waste your time with another offer we are leaving. That's pretty conclusive. If tigers wait till November and he leaves the headlines are worse imo. This way the club got in front of those headlinesYou realise Richardson played a big role in this?
There’s no reason this couldn’t wait until November, when we hopefully would have had more data to use in our negotiations. Talking after we played finals would have changed perceptions a bit.
Probably wouldn’t have made a difference, but it may have.