OFFICIAL Lachlan Galvin #277 *Released* Career Discussion.

Which means Haywood is demoted. And as a Bulldogs junior, that would be a slap in the face for the kid.

I reckon WT should make a play for him. Can fill halves, and play the ball-playing lock position too. Signed until 2026, but see if they're open to him moving.

If they're shopping around Mahoney though, then forget it. They'll likely turn Haywood into a #9.
Ciraldo usually plays a couple of utilities.
 
This very risky from the Bulldogs. They are in 1st and now want to change their halvesz especially if Galvin and Burton are the choice as they aren't natural 7s
Yah I'd be shocked if there's not some unhappy people at the Dogs over this. It's just so odd - they genuinely don't need Galvin.

And given how bratty he and his family have been, if he's not starting he's not going there. Sure he might start at the bench for a week or two, but it won't last.

Only way I see it working over there is if they turn him into a lock immediately, which is where he is destined to be. And good luck in the middle Gal.
 
That is a bloody good point, to get Galvin for the remains of this season would be costing them around $400.000.
So with that team, how would they have any spare cap money. You would have to wonder ????.
Only 5 months of contract year left at 700k works out just under 300k. The interesting thing is they have Leo Thompson signed from next year as well - you would think they will have to let a few go.
 
I don't know that I've said it on here but privately I've been convinced he was going to the dogs for a long time now.

Phil Gould didn't just react this week, he orchestrated the whole damn thing and Galvin knew he had a deal at the dogs. Probably started around the time they hired Vella or shortly after they got wind of Galvin being unhappy.

Galvin might have stayed had they not have come calling.

Gould is up to his ears in it.

Parra have been played as fools being the team to take the focus off the Dogs having this locked up a long time ago. Sucks to be the Eels but this is what happens when real clubs play games with shit clubs. Us included.

All I hope is that Richardson is aware of all that has taken place and has formulated an outcome that suits our team. I'm sure he has and I reckon we will see it play out very soon.
 
Do you guys remember us getting rejected in hiring Laurie Daley for a coaching role because of a "conflict of interest"? Apparently, due to media commitments and its ties to wagering.

Abdo is just too scared to take on Gus.

But I'm glad to be rid of the cancer. The kid has issues.
 
Am I missing something here?

Don’t managers get paid as a percentage of their players contract?

If so, Moses (who if you believe most on this forum) has instigated this whole sorry saga, so he himself, could get less money 🤔

Doesn’t the way it’s played out, now suggest that the manager was just doing what the player requested him to do?

As I said at the start - Am I missing something here? 🤷‍♂️
Unless there is contra payments to the player or manager 🤔
 
Back
Top