HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

Vicious said:
Ok well keep running with the agenda that nothing was done to p them off and they just decided to cause the uproar for absolutely no reason whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Ill ask you for the 50th time...

If Richo was the problem, why did hbg sack the board and not Richo? Why did DP come out and say that Richo was safe, if Richo was the problem? What exactly did the board members do?

As long as you come on here promoting theories in your head as fact without any evidence, I will question you.. don't take it personally either - nothing personal, just answer the question and we can all move forward.
 
Last edited:
BZN said:
G'day Craegus~~this would have to be one of the most nicely worded post on here, very well done.

Not everyone answers every post and there is no obligation to do so.

So, I respectfully decline your invitation at this point in time.

But I am sure and certain the time will come that I do.

So, the best I can do is send you a heartfelt Very Happy and Safe Christmas wish.
Click to expand...

So little said, but so much of an answer you gave. I am now pretty certain you have confirmed all that I had thought before asking with that response.
 
Telltails said:
That was rebuked by the people who were sacked, reinstated, and were there!
It was and still is about control - start and finish.
Now they have it we will see what decisions they make with it.
First one extending Benji for five years...
Click to expand...
It’s clearly about control and hence the new WT board structure that flies in the face of the independent review a couple of years ago. This is why the WT Unite group will continue pushing for independence. Anybody suggesting we need to wait and see how they go needs to look back over the last 10 years or so.
You don’t need 10 years on training wheels to learn how to successfully run an NRL club. Time to let those with proven skillsets to do it. What a shame we had that in place only to blow it up and again remind the NRL community what a joke we really are. A loveable joke for many of us who can’t let go evidently.
 
Bus 2 Terrigal said:
And here’s something that comes from someone who does matter at both Western Subs & Wests Ts (unlike the click bait Suzie posted the other day)

This one is worth posting - although won’t garner much interest here as it doesn’t fit the anti Western Subs narrative 🥴
Click to expand...
1000050459.jpg
Why does Wests Tigers have an asterisk after it? Why is Wests capitalised?

Why can't anyone mention Balmain?

You guys seem rabid.
 
Mighty_Tiger said:
Know emotions are high, I’m not a fan of what has occurred but I find the statement is fine given Leo primary role.

What it does say is his focus on the board is to support the Magpies which we all knew anyway - at least he is being honest about it.
Click to expand...
I’ve got no issue with Magpies staffers being focussed on the Magpies. You’d expect this to be the case. Just leave WT to run WT and with only WT interests in mind, not what’s best for Balmain or Magpies. If loyalists on either side of the JV want to use WT to advance their club than they need to stay out of our club and just toil away in theirs exclusively.
 
FacePalm said:
Burgess and Montgomery/Epifania were on the board. They knew what was going on, unless they were that incompetent they didn’t know what was happening regarding football business right in front of them.

Successful and capable people on the board were making decisions committed to Wests Tigers, and they didn’t like it.
Click to expand...
Okay.. You have a fair point. HBG lost control and got scared. I had also thought Jealousy as Burgess would be of Barry.

FacePalm said:
Whether it was too much orange (a key differentiator for the club in the comp), or leichhardt oval (regarded as one-off the best venues to watch rugby league), or whatever. These are tangible and intangible assets to the Wests Tigers, and these cronies stuck in the past can’t handle that neither may be a magpies legacy.
Click to expand...
Did you see above where the Broncos had an All Black Jersey!
All Black, they also had a Black Jersey with Yellow stripes. You know the Broncos, the Maroon, gold and white Broncos!

FacePalm said:
Outnumbered on the football board, they couldn’t control the strategic direction of the NRL club.
Click to expand...

Yep, that's probably it.
The more I think about it, we need to remember total Incompetence. Sadly many conspiracy theories can be explained that way as well.

Maybe Burgess forgot about the GM's clause that if the Independent members are sacked he is out of there. I doubt it and it looks like he is being set up with that "anonymous allegation". But hey Idiots!
 
mtd#2 said:
You've put forward theories based on your feelings. This doesn't equate to explaining a single thing that actually took place.

You continue to point the finger at Richo as being the ringleader for everything wrong with the Tigers. You claim he was intentionally sneaky and hiding things from the board.

But you still can't answer these questions after 400 pages:
1. Why wasn't Richo sacked?
2. Why were the 4 independents sacked if Richo was the one keeping everything from everyone?
3. Why weren't the 2 HBG board members sacked if they attended all board meetings and failed to communicate back to HBG?

400 pages of you and others unable to answer these direct questions

Here are some terms I suggest becoming familiar with:

Dogmatic: Someone who states their beliefs as if they are absolute truths, regardless of facts or counter-arguments. They often rely on "because I said so" logic.

Sophistry: A person using "sophistry" is a sophist. They use clever but false arguments that seem plausible on the surface but crumble when you ask for specific details or facts.
Click to expand...
Am I in the Twilight Zone?

A week ago I was getting badgered for asking questions regarding our lack of any real knowledge of the situation because all we had to go on was reports & beliefs based on history.

Now the "Wests Magpies/HBG Apologists" are getting badgered for sophistry & being dogmatic.

The wheel certainly does turn.
 
"Dogmatic: Someone who states their beliefs as if they are absolute truths, regardless of facts or counter-arguments. They often rely on "because I said so" logic."

402 pages of examples of this.

Not all Wests Magpies or HBG apologists.
 
Vicious said:
Rightly or wrongly it was a power grab due to a number of circumstances that led them to b peed off,
This is the part many people including yourself know is true, but for some reason do not want to acknowledge.
Removing the board members was wrong, but some of the circumstances that led to them making this type of irrational decision were also wrong.
Click to expand...
What were those 'circumstances'? With two HBG members on the Wests Tigers board how did they allow those 'circumstances' to eventuate? Incompetence?
I have still not seen any believable explanation from HBG about their reasoning, or a description of the mysterious 'circumstances'. Unless and until they disclose their reasoning, I will continue to believe that their actions were incompetent at best. Just like their feeble attempt at a video explanation that was quickly retracted.
Not at all the level of competence of any organisation I would want controlling the future of my club.
 
The Chad said:
"Dogmatic: Someone who states their beliefs as if they are absolute truths, regardless of facts or counter-arguments. They often rely on "because I said so" logic."

402 pages of examples of this.

Not all Wests Magpies or HBG apologists.
Click to expand...
What are you trying to prove?

You come on here, often with a huge gap in factual information, and try to refute the obvious or things already proven to be true.

I know you're an old Wests fan, but trying to come off as objective isn't really working for you.
 
weststigers said:
View attachment 31351
Why does Wests Tigers have an asterisk after it? Why is Wests capitalised?

Why can't anyone mention Balmain?

You guys seem rabid.
Click to expand...
i actually commend the *by laws* of the site. Somewhere to chat about Wests juniors only, and their development.
Sure a few pensioners here could scrape together the purchase of a pack of Sao's and join the circle, and leave us WestsTigers supporters to ponder amongst our selves
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 926 (members: 4, guests: 922)
Back
Top