This is disgusting low life stuff from you, but you're not the only one doing it, as there must have been a dozen or so similar remarks made.
HBG, Independent Directors Sacked
- Thread starter BlackWhiteGold
- Start date
Coastie_Tiger
Well-known member
Lets do some revision here Balmain were granted or set to be granted the 14th license at the time. The magpies were out, Balmain realized unless they merged it was only a matter of time for them also before they got the punt forever. They were more financial than Wests at the time iirc, It was a marriage that served both parties at the time.
Fast forward and Balmain shot themselves in the foot with the leagues club debacle which gave Wests Ashfield the chance to step up which at the time they did.
As i stated above Wests nor Balmain would be here without the other, so the in fighting from the old dinosaurs from both sides tbf need to wake up to themselves and stop a very long time ago. You would have thought 2005 would have been enough to galvanize and stick solid but not us can't have that squabbling at board level is the name of the game.
If we aren't careful We might get what was coming to us both 25 years ago extinction, I dont want that i moved on 25 yrs ago along with the majority on here and realized that we needed to co exist.
Its the Wests Tigers thats the only license that will surivive and so it should be, if your under the age of 30-35 you likely wouldn't have a scooby doo about the history of Wests and Balmain. I really don't understand why its so har4d for some to fathom.
BTW not having a crack at your post whatsoever just led into my points.
Bus 2 Terrigal
Well-known member
I don't think the club can be accused of being trigger happy in relation to sacking coaches.
Not since Mick Potter, a decade ago
Footy players play footy.
Their only concern is if the coach remains the coach.
If Benji decides to go, then all bets are off
None of the Boardroom stuff should impact the teams on field results in 26.
Although you watch it being trotted out as an excuse if they lose first up to the Bye
This is a disgusting low life tactic on here.
I hope the Mods. put an end to this cheap trash talk.
weststigers
Well-known member
Fast approaching net-zero
twentyforty
Well-known member
Yeh, probably wouldn’t matter how big a stick and carrot he carries, the usurpers are very comfortable in the knowledge that it’s easy to sack people and wind back their work.
I don’t understand why so many on here criticised the performances of Pascoe and Hagipantelis. The very reason they had to go, following the Crawford Barnier review was because they were being overmanaged as Hagipantelis eluded to on numerous occasions. “We are here at the behest of the owners.”
That doesn't seem to be the case in the modern game, with players thinking about how their careers play out and develop. If they are at a club which seems to be going nowhere, many players (no doubt inspired by social media, media and their managers) start looking for their longer-term future and whether other players in the team, the coach, will still be around next season. And so it becomes self-fulfilling.
Look at the teams which have histories of solid performances on field, over a period of years. They tend to be very well-run off field.
Tom Shines
Well-known member
Is your man Burgo getting the flick or not? The drums are beating louder ,,,
Canberratiger
Well-known member
Shut up, you fool.
Everything has been explained to you so many times, but you just ignore i,t then play the victim when someone calls out your BS.
The vast majority of Wests Tigers fans want change, but it is due to selfish individuals like yourself and the clowns at HBG that we can't move forward as a club.
Stop living in the past and move with the times!
BAGNF05
Well-known member
If you don’t like it you have some respect for yourself and leave. Pascoe did 9 years!
BAGNF05 may well "be able to draw a conclusion ".
But his conclusion may be different to yours.
So, how about you tell us yours?
Tom Shines
Well-known member
Lee H said a long time before the review something along the lines of “he serves at the pleasure of the owners “…. Then when they tried to get rid of him he fought them tooth and nail …
He had to go for continued incompetence… he is a lawyer not a football club administrator..
Chunk
Well-known member
Because they're idiots
Bus 2 Terrigal
Well-known member
Which masthead/source is it?
Talking to yourself now?
Tom Shines
Well-known member
A real one..
Jolls
Well-known member
You are missing the point. It is not that Meilekamp has plans to sack Benji or that the Mastrov rumour was incorrect. It is the deliberate destabilisation to set conditions for potential action. They set the conditions to make it untenable for Richo to remain - is this setting the conditions for Benji to walk. I don't know what the motives are, and unless you have inside information, neither do you.
The subtle leaks to the media are affecting the playing and coaching staff. If HBG are serious about making a fist of this the same or similar policy to the previous regime needs to be in place in relation to media leaks.
weststigers
Well-known member
There's still time to wake up to yourself
Chunk
Well-known member
I found this in another thread.
Is this true because how can you call yourself the owners when you contibute less then 10% of the funding?
Main sources of funding for WTRLFC are the NRL grant ($20m), WT operations such as merchandising, ticketing ($3.3), sponsorships ($6.5m). HBG's contribution to WTRLFC funding is $1.7m.
Is this true because how can you call yourself the owners when you contibute less then 10% of the funding?
Main sources of funding for WTRLFC are the NRL grant ($20m), WT operations such as merchandising, ticketing ($3.3), sponsorships ($6.5m). HBG's contribution to WTRLFC funding is $1.7m.
