TheDaBoss
Well-known member
what about Tasmania :smirk:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week
Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits
They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially
It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates
Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work
@OzLuke said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:I still think a team would be better off in NZ or PNG..... Wellington or Port Moresby I think would be fantastic......
Another Brisbane team I think would flop.....and if you think guys like Langer would go back???? The Broncos butter his bread and have done for a long time....
@OzLuke said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:I still think a team would be better off in NZ or PNG..... Wellington or Port Moresby I think would be fantastic......
Another Brisbane team I think would flop.....and if you think guys like Langer would go back???? The Broncos butter his bread and have done for a long time....
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week
Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits
They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially
It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates
Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work
TV Ratings...
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week
Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits
They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially
It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates
Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work
TV Ratings...
You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane
Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week
Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits
They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially
It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates
Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work
TV Ratings...
You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane
Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily
I guess Ipswich would double the crowd numbers by counting both heads..
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week
Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits
They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially
It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates
Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work
TV Ratings...
You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane
Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily
I guess Ipswich would double the crowd numbers by counting both heads..
Your getting old / slow ...took you that long dopey
Do you as a fan want the NRL to prop up a club like it has with the Titans etc
Ipswich is far more sustainable , will get far more sponsors and get greater memberships ...your talking about a city which is one of the fastest growing in Australia .....and affordable at the same time
@gallagher said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week
Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits
They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially
It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates
Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work
TV Ratings...
You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane
Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily
I guess Ipswich would double the crowd numbers by counting both heads..
Your getting old / slow ...took you that long dopey
Do you as a fan want the NRL to prop up a club like it has with the Titans etc
Ipswich is far more sustainable , will get far more sponsors and get greater memberships ...your talking about a city which is one of the fastest growing in Australia .....and affordable at the same time
They said all that about Campbo in 86. We had to merge 14 years later.
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@gallagher said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week
Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits
They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially
It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates
Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work
TV Ratings...
You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane
Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily
I guess Ipswich would double the crowd numbers by counting both heads..
Your getting old / slow ...took you that long dopey
Do you as a fan want the NRL to prop up a club like it has with the Titans etc
Ipswich is far more sustainable , will get far more sponsors and get greater memberships ...your talking about a city which is one of the fastest growing in Australia .....and affordable at the same time
They said all that about Campbo in 86. We had to merge 14 years later.
Far different situation
Wests had 3 Finals appearances in 15 years
And the majority of the other seasons were bottom 4 seasons
The amount of players from Qld that get missed by the Broncos ,Titans and Cows is massive ...how many current NRL players are from Ipswich ......Keary , Mikaele , Nui ...probably heaps I can't remember
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@gallagher said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week
Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits
They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially
It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates
Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work
TV Ratings...
You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane
Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily
I guess Ipswich would double the crowd numbers by counting both heads..
Your getting old / slow ...took you that long dopey
Do you as a fan want the NRL to prop up a club like it has with the Titans etc
Ipswich is far more sustainable , will get far more sponsors and get greater memberships ...your talking about a city which is one of the fastest growing in Australia .....and affordable at the same time
They said all that about Campbo in 86. We had to merge 14 years later.
Far different situation
Wests had 3 Finals appearances in 15 years
And the majority of the other seasons were bottom 4 seasons
The amount of players from Qld that get missed by the Broncos ,Titans and Cows is massive ...how many current NRL players are from Ipswich ......Keary , Mikaele , Nui ...probably heaps I can't remember
@OzLuke said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:I still think a team would be better off in NZ or PNG..... Wellington or Port Moresby I think would be fantastic......
Another Brisbane team I think would flop.....and if you think guys like Langer would go back???? The Broncos butter his bread and have done for a long time....
@Snake said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:Beijing Pandas ! No problem with memberships there ..