2nd side in Brisbane , 17th side

@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week

Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits

They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially

It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates

Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work
 
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week

Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits

They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially

It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates

Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work

TV Ratings...
 
I still think a team would be better off in NZ or PNG..... Wellington or Port Moresby I think would be fantastic......

Another Brisbane team I think would flop.....and if you think guys like Langer would go back???? The Broncos butter his bread and have done for a long time....
 
@OzLuke said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
I still think a team would be better off in NZ or PNG..... Wellington or Port Moresby I think would be fantastic......

Another Brisbane team I think would flop.....and if you think guys like Langer would go back???? The Broncos butter his bread and have done for a long time....

Perth wouldnt be bad either
 
@OzLuke said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
I still think a team would be better off in NZ or PNG..... Wellington or Port Moresby I think would be fantastic......

Another Brisbane team I think would flop.....and if you think guys like Langer would go back???? The Broncos butter his bread and have done for a long time....

That is why I'm saying Ipswich ..not Brisbane ....and you get Kevin Walters coaching them and Alfie back ....Alf is a God in Ipswich
 
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week

Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits

They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially

It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates

Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work

TV Ratings...

You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane

Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily
 
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week

Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits

They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially

It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates

Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work

TV Ratings...

You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane

Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily

I guess Ipswich would double the crowd numbers by counting both heads..
 
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week

Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits

They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially

It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates

Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work

TV Ratings...

You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane

Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily

I guess Ipswich would double the crowd numbers by counting both heads..

Your getting old / slow ...took you that long dopey

Do you as a fan want the NRL to prop up a club like it has with the Titans etc

Ipswich is far more sustainable , will get far more sponsors and get greater memberships ...your talking about a city which is one of the fastest growing in Australia .....and affordable at the same time
 
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week

Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits

They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially

It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates

Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work

TV Ratings...

You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane

Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily

I guess Ipswich would double the crowd numbers by counting both heads..

Your getting old / slow ...took you that long dopey

Do you as a fan want the NRL to prop up a club like it has with the Titans etc

Ipswich is far more sustainable , will get far more sponsors and get greater memberships ...your talking about a city which is one of the fastest growing in Australia .....and affordable at the same time

They said all that about Campbo in 86. We had to merge 14 years later.
 
Ipswich is not Brisbane.
It has a really strong rugby league history and has produced many stars.
I reckon a team out of Ipswich would have an immediate following. At very least it's worth a feasibility study.
 
@gallagher said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week

Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits

They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially

It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates

Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work

TV Ratings...

You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane

Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily

I guess Ipswich would double the crowd numbers by counting both heads..

Your getting old / slow ...took you that long dopey

Do you as a fan want the NRL to prop up a club like it has with the Titans etc

Ipswich is far more sustainable , will get far more sponsors and get greater memberships ...your talking about a city which is one of the fastest growing in Australia .....and affordable at the same time

They said all that about Campbo in 86. We had to merge 14 years later.

Far different situation

Wests had 3 Finals appearances in 15 years

And the majority of the other seasons were bottom 4 seasons

The amount of players from Qld that get missed by the Broncos ,Titans and Cows is massive ...how many current NRL players are from Ipswich ......Keary , Mikaele , Nui ...probably heaps I can't remember
 
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@gallagher said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week

Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits

They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially

It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates

Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work

TV Ratings...

You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane

Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily

I guess Ipswich would double the crowd numbers by counting both heads..

Your getting old / slow ...took you that long dopey

Do you as a fan want the NRL to prop up a club like it has with the Titans etc

Ipswich is far more sustainable , will get far more sponsors and get greater memberships ...your talking about a city which is one of the fastest growing in Australia .....and affordable at the same time

They said all that about Campbo in 86. We had to merge 14 years later.

Far different situation

Wests had 3 Finals appearances in 15 years

And the majority of the other seasons were bottom 4 seasons

The amount of players from Qld that get missed by the Broncos ,Titans and Cows is massive ...how many current NRL players are from Ipswich ......Keary , Mikaele , Nui ...probably heaps I can't remember

I dont know either. Concentrating on one section of Brisbane seems risky to me. I'd be appealing to all the south east of QLD.
 
What's with the names, bombers and now this one..

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/a-little-nhl-but-also-very-rugby-league-will-this-be-the-name-of-brisbanes-second-nrl-team/news-story/8754ebab882a140f3913bfcdc3f78935

Brisbane’s Eastern Suburbs District Rugby League Football Club Inc — behind one four reported bids to become the city’s second team in the NRL — filed a trademark on the title “Brisbane Firehawks” this week.
 
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@gallagher said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@happy_tiger said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
@Geo said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
They do not care how many memberships the 2nd Brisbane team gets...they do not care how big the crowds will be...What the NRL care about is the Broadcast market..the ability to have a Thursday or Friday night game every week with 2 games broadcast into the market instead of every second week

Which they can still do with an Ipswich side and still get all the benefits

They put a 2nd side in Brisbane now ....they will literally have to prop it up financially

It failed in Brisbane even with all the anti Broncos sentiment back with the Crushers ...it will go even worse now ...and the local teams idea with Redcliffe and Easts won't draw poo and alienates any other BRL club affiliates

Unless you know the history of Brisbane RL and the history of what the Broncos did to the local BRL you can't understand what will and won't work

TV Ratings...

You want another GC failure you pick Brisbane

Ipswich would be the Newcastle of Qld .....more successful /popular than the Cowboys easily

I guess Ipswich would double the crowd numbers by counting both heads..

Your getting old / slow ...took you that long dopey

Do you as a fan want the NRL to prop up a club like it has with the Titans etc

Ipswich is far more sustainable , will get far more sponsors and get greater memberships ...your talking about a city which is one of the fastest growing in Australia .....and affordable at the same time

They said all that about Campbo in 86. We had to merge 14 years later.

Far different situation

Wests had 3 Finals appearances in 15 years

And the majority of the other seasons were bottom 4 seasons

The amount of players from Qld that get missed by the Broncos ,Titans and Cows is massive ...how many current NRL players are from Ipswich ......Keary , Mikaele , Nui ...probably heaps I can't remember

Our current top 30 has quite a few Queenslanders. Off the top of my head: Luke Garner, Thomas Mikaele, Harry Grant, Chris McQueen, Corey Thompson, Billy Walters. Although to be fair, the only one who was "missed" is Luke Garner.
 
A lot of fine players come out of Ipswich, David Fifita, Marion Seve and Thomas Mikaele being three that immediately come to mind. Keebra Park also attract s lot of talent from the area.
 
@OzLuke said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
I still think a team would be better off in NZ or PNG..... Wellington or Port Moresby I think would be fantastic......

Another Brisbane team I think would flop.....and if you think guys like Langer would go back???? The Broncos butter his bread and have done for a long time....

I really don't think PNG would work.
 
@Snake said in [2nd side in Brisbane said:
Beijing Pandas ! No problem with memberships there ..

Sorry Adelaide Pandas is already taken ![unnamed (1).jpg](/assets/uploads/files/1591180928712-unnamed-1.jpg)
 
Back
Top