avocadoontoast
Well-known member
Packer in particular of late has been a real disappointment. Very low work rate, bordering on lazy. No impact whatsoever.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:@ said:I would take Woods back at the right price (i.e Bulldogs paying a large sum of his contract) and play him at lock due to his long minutes and possible changes to the interchange (8 to 6).
As would I. Personally I don't think Packer and Matulino are setting the world on fire for us, they're not averaging more than 100m per game and Packer doesn't average much at all. I think Woods would complement both of them. Start Woods and Packer with Mats and Twal off the bench.
@ said:He’s going to Cronulla - close the thread!!
@ said:Forget Woods, Tapou should be our focus, he’s an impact player - not a lumbering back turner,
@ said:He’s going to Cronulla - close the thread!!
@ said:Sharkies have pulled out from Woods signing.
@ said:@ said:Sharkies have pulled out from Woods signing.
Source?
@ said:@ said:@ said:Sharkies have pulled out from Woods signing.
Source?
Tomato.
@ said:Holy moley this is going to keep dragging on. The NRL and the Bulldogs have a lot to answer for - it should never have been allowed to get to this point regardless of anyone's feelings towards Woods.
@ said:Sharkies have pulled out from Woods signing.
@ said:@ said:Sharkies have pulled out from Woods signing.
Any truth to this or you just talking crap?
@ said:@ said:@ said:Sharkies have pulled out from Woods signing.
Any truth to this or you just talking crap?
Hooper just said on 360 the Woods to sharks move still likely before June 30.