T
tigerbalm
Guest
@rossop said:Zero Tackle are reporting its a done deal.
So are wests.
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.1.5_
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@rossop said:Zero Tackle are reporting its a done deal.
@Tony33 said:This would've been awesome news if we had a replacement, but we don't so don't know how to feel about this tbh. Something tells me Taylor is lining up a few good signings for the 2016 season.
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.1.4_
@Sabre said:Can someone explain something to me?
Taylor says we won't be making any major signings for 2015, but if Blair only had 1 year left on his contract why have we released him?
He would have been off contract the following year anyway, either way he have more money to sign players for 2016, but releasing Blair means we now have a disastrous looking back row next year.
@PYMBLEPETE said:The only thing that gives me a bit of hope out of all this is that Taylor, Moss and Co must have known what they were getting themselves into cap wise before taking on these gigs. What Penrith went through shedding players was similar to what we are seeing at the Tigers. That seems to have worked out OK for the Panthers after a couple of years, but it is pretty clear that 2015 is a write-off for us.
@Cosimo_Zaretti said:@Newtown said:The club's action today are a sign of financial desperation. Instead of pulling the jumper over the supporters' eyes why doesn't the club be honest and come out and say outright that Blair was released because the club is CAP BROKE and even though Blair has been released CANNOT AFFORD to buy any further new players for 2015.
They're like that mate who doesn't admit to having no money until you actually get to the bar, so it's all just awkward.
@LaT said:@Sabre said:Can someone explain something to me?
Taylor says we won't be making any major signings for 2015, but if Blair only had 1 year left on his contract why have we released him?
He would have been off contract the following year anyway, either way he have more money to sign players for 2016, but releasing Blair means we now have a disastrous looking back row next year.
Blair may have been backloaded, either a large amount or small for his final year. There may be other contracts in the club that are due to upgrades etc. Or maybe we had arranged some of our younger guys to be backloaded for 2016 and beyond in order to keep them here, but letting Blair go means we don't have to do that.
Releasing Blair now may have allowed the acceleration of a new strategy or relief for 2015\. Or maybe Blair had some big bucks on offer from Bennett and wanted out?
Lots of possible reasons.
@Newtown said:@LaT said:@Sabre said:Can someone explain something to me?
Taylor says we won't be making any major signings for 2015, but if Blair only had 1 year left on his contract why have we released him?
He would have been off contract the following year anyway, either way he have more money to sign players for 2016, but releasing Blair means we now have a disastrous looking back row next year.
Blair may have been backloaded, either a large amount or small for his final year. There may be other contracts in the club that are due to upgrades etc. Or maybe we had arranged some of our younger guys to be backloaded for 2016 and beyond in order to keep them here, but letting Blair go means we don't have to do that.
Releasing Blair now may have allowed the acceleration of a new strategy or relief for 2015\. Or maybe Blair had some big bucks on offer from Bennett and wanted out?
Lots of possible reasons.
Lots of possible reasons but you tell me one supporter who knows the real reason/s. The reality is there is none because the club is keeping his financial mess completely under covers and leaving the supporters to stew by themselves.
@Newtown said:I wonder how much Mayer had to fork out to keep Tedesco. It looks like it broke the bank. Any chance Lawrence can follow the same path as Blair?