@Telltails said in [Balmain Leagues Club](/post/1057652) said:
@rozelle_rudy said in [Balmain Leagues Club](/post/1057644) said:
@Russell Look, I'm no friend of Darcy Byrne but I can't see why people are blaming him for this. Balmain has been a basket case for more than a decade, long before Darcy came along. How is any of this his fault?
I think people are dirty at Darcy because he and those on council have blocked all attempts to redevelop the sight for years, some would suggest for his own political gain. Now they are in a position that they may have no say in the outcome of the site, and plans are finally passed /excepted. All a little too late.
Yes the problem with Darcy is he tries to position himself as a supporter of Balmain but can't appear to do anything to actually help the club out. I don't deny he may well have a passion for the Tigers, but he has been a councillor for 12 years and Mayor on/off since 2012 (multiple terms), in which time Balmain Leagues has slid off the face of the Earth.
@rozelle_rudy is incorrect about Darcy's tenure - Balmain didn't vacate the Victoria Rd site until 2010 and Darcy had already been on the Council for the previous 2 years. Additionally, Balmain only vacated based on the agreement with the NSW Labor Govt regarding the Rozelle Metro, which was supposed to put a station underground at the site, with the Leagues Club being built back over once complete. Instead, however, Labor abandoned the plan (whilst in power, might I add, and at a cost of $500M invested), leaving Balmain high and dry. We needed a big redevelopment then to secure the club future, and Leichhardt Council blocked every turn. Eventually it was escalated to the NSW Govt special developments branch to try and get things moving.
So for Darcy it's all lip service. Regarding Leichhardt Oval, I may be wrong, but the council invests the bare minimum to keep it operational. One of the larger recent remedial works was initiated and co-funded by the NSW Govt.
I do understand what the Inner West Council has a lot of NIMBYs to deal with and have always been heavily Labor and, more recently, Greens dominated, and they aren't necessarily parties focused on Leagues development nor local rugby league. It's become somewhat of an irony that in some areas Labor have become quite disconnected from their working-class roots, esp. given that the Balmain district is now about as white-collar as Sydney gets.
In that case, then, Darcy could just keep his mouth shut and nobody would complain about him.
I also know for a fact that some of the original development plans submitted by Balmain were taking the piss, i.e. trying to squeeze as much possible development out of the application. That's not bad in and of itself, because applications can always be subject to negotiation, but I understand the minimum that Balmain could accept and the max that Leichhardt Council would accept were quite far apart.
Ultimately, my understanding is that Leichhardt Council were somewhat burned by the eventual size and scope of the Balmain Power Station redevelopment - the number of people it brought to the area and the number of extra cars put on the road. I don't live there, though I visit regularly, so I can't honestly say. But as with a previous post, you only need look at the stalling at White Bay to show that the council and State Govt really doesn't know what to do with major redevelopments in Balmain. Even the Fish Markets redevelopment has been stop-start and revised for years, try to accommodate a wide variety of interests and fundamentally lacking public transport links.