@Fade To Black said:@foreveratiger said:@Tiger In The Gong said:@batboy said:Why do people keep talking about the Tigers "Letting him go"
Because we did. The club publicly backed Moses and as such left him little option.
Its not rocket science.
That is because our Club has got a fetty for Moses :unamused: , Austin was the one in form last year and Moses had no right to take the 5/8 position of him . But our Club love the Word potential , give me Austin over Moses anyday.
That is not wishing any bad will on Moses just thought Austin was treated unfairly anyway we live in hope that we have made the right choice in time .
Well said. Clubs have to make choices on who to keep sometimes and those decisions sometimes prove themselves wrong over time. IMO Moses will be a better player than Austin, but Austin probably deserved to be playing ahead of Moses at the back end of last season. It is no surprise that he got disgruntled TBH.
For every 10 players we let go one always stands up and people will complain about.
Blake asked for a release to get an easier option to play 1st grade, he did the same at the Panthers.
If a player doesn't want to be here why keep him especially one that has an off field record.
People are bagging decision to stick with Mosses however failed to realise that Blake on the field demands the attention away from the other play makers which would limit Tedesco, Brooks and Farahs ability. Blake is a very selfish player in general and when your trying to build a team as such whilst he is a good player he isn't a fit for what we need or a building towards. I doubt he could do what Farah, Moses or Brooks are doing and pull themselves back into the structure Taylor is installing within the club.
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_