@formerguest said:
Maybe his best, but still not to the level that Moses showed against the dogs in one of his first few games.
Blake was good for us as a utility, but had a good offer that we could not possibly match and wanted out. Should we have forced him to stay and hold him back like the Sharks are doing with Gordon? No of course not for mine, so we let him go, yes we agreed to his request.
Now we have a BS comparison poll in another thread. Let it go people, he has moved on, time for some on here to do the same and let bygones be bygones.
I would be surprised if money was the reason he left, more like he knew , or was told he would not be given a chance at 5/8 as it was already decided who would be there no matter how he played
But after seeing how he is improving, listening to how some keep trumpeting Moses as a SOO player, shows a lack of reality.
Austin is actually showing that he has the ability to do so. While Moses fan club keep referring to His feats as a junior and in Lower grades, something that he can't replicate in first grade, which happens to a lot of"next best things"
Moses has to firstly make first grade,( austins done thatin a big way, ) and if he was in any other club he would be back in reserves by now . Then he has to improve enough to beat blokes like Bird and Keary ( and Austin) just to name a few
I hope he can do it, but nothing I've seen so far, shows anything like the legend that surrounds him. And (as it's pretty obvious), I'm getting pretty sick of seeing a defensive liability, with maybe 5 minutes of activity as his complete contribution to a game.
Whether it's his fault, or Taylor's, I don't know or care anymore, But for Gods sake please put someone in there who can make a contribution to the team, even if it's only someone who isn't a speed bump.
Comparisons between AUstin and Moses , if looked at objectively , can only have one conclusion