Brooks is no good

He put in a decent effort in a side that was on the back foot and hanging on by a thread most of the game.
 
@ said:
Very average 1st half, all the usual stuff, poor 5th tackle options, some shocking passes, than I thought he had a strong second half. Very hard to shine as no7 when every set your 90m from the try line. Badger was poor as always and certainly gifted the Pennys plenty of yards and possession

What a load of garbage. Badger was pro Tigers today. Our shocking hands and poor defence, as always, lost that game.
 
I think Gamble is a five eight.
It's s hard one half backs that lack a running game are seen as one dimensional. Then a half that lacks organising skills is seen as a runner. Even DCE isn't seen as a traditional halfback.
But the question is which is easier to develop game awareness or running skill and instinct.
 
Be interesting to see how long Cleary perseveres with Brooks in 2018 ….. he just hasn't got it at first grade level.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Will develop into very good player.

3 seasons developing…lets get real boss

Gamble hasn't played a game in the NRL yet you are writing him up as a NRL player?

He doesn't have to offer much to take Brooks spot, and he kicks goals, something Tui can't manage. :angry:
 
@ said:
@ said:
Will develop into very good player.

In how many years ? Burst onto the scene v the dragons ,,,was going to be the next joey johns ….wouldn't tie joeys bootlaces

As soon as you finish your chicken and chips.
But seriously …... he is 22 and learning his trade.
By the time his next contract comes up we'll be falling over ourselves trying to sign him.
My opinion only. 😛ray:
 
@ said:
Brooks has had his chance imo .his kicking game isn't up to first grade standard ,,, that was the difference today , like most weeks :deadhorse:

Thanks, I needed something boring to put me to sleep tonight
 

Latest posts

Back
Top