Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@tiger5150 said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1454834) said:Oh thank God Demps! I have been waiting for an opportunity to discuss whether Brooks was any good and at a loss where to vent my feelings.
@lukic said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1454835) said:Brooks' kicking game isn't very good. I'm not too concerned what the stats say, but for a lot of those, he's up the top because he's played every game and is our dominant kicker.
He very, very rarely finds the grass on his long kicks and his attacking kicks from 30-40 out aren't good. I will admit though, his kicks closer to the in-goal have been good - Ken and Talau have picked up a few tries from nice cross-field kicks.
@gcfan said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1454837) said:Just what we need, another Brooks bashing thread 😂
@needaname said in [Brooks is no good](/post/835640) said:I to am fed up with the lack of decisions on the last.
Brooks has improved his running and his involvement but at the moment he is just a shuffler. I am still waiting for him to take the game by the scruff. He lacks instinct. It's hooker or halfback in ISP next year I think for Brooks.
Still concerned about lohehea at Fullback next year think we really are stupid to not sign a dedicated fullback. And by do we lack a hooker. Even still I think Jacob will probably be playing part of the year in ISP next year to get his strength up.
Good to see Cleary can make a rubbish side play commited.
@demps said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1454828) said:@needaname said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1454827) said:@demps said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1454812) said:Please review this topic in 2021...
?
Do we really need to regurgitate another Luke Brooks thread?
Regardless.
League leader in Attacking kicks.
7th in league in forced drop outs.
4th in league for total kicks.
5th in league for kick meters.
7th in league for long kicks.
14th in weighted kicks.
17th in the league for kicks, kicked dead. (Scale from worst to best)
15th in the league for kick errors. (Scale from worst to best)
Luke Brooks kicking game is not the problem!
Yes.
The club is doing an end of season review and hopefully it will bring results.
I read over this thread and it was interesting to see, some of the things that are being said now were also said 4 years ago.
I thought it was quite interesting.
His kicking game is not the problem?
I would disagree.
@demps said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1454862) said:@needaname said in [Brooks is no good](/post/835640) said:I to am fed up with the lack of decisions on the last.
Brooks has improved his running and his involvement but at the moment he is just a shuffler. I am still waiting for him to take the game by the scruff. He lacks instinct. It's hooker or halfback in ISP next year I think for Brooks.
Still concerned about lohehea at Fullback next year think we really are stupid to not sign a dedicated fullback. And by do we lack a hooker. Even still I think Jacob will probably be playing part of the year in ISP next year to get his strength up.
Good to see Cleary can make a rubbish side play commited.
Changed ya opinion ?
@needaname said in [Brooks is no good](/post/835686) said:I think Gamble is a five eight.
It's s hard one half backs that lack a running game are seen as one dimensional. Then a half that lacks organising skills is seen as a runner. Even DCE isn't seen as a traditional halfback.
But the question is which is easier to develop game awareness or running skill and instinct.
@needaname said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1454869) said:I can’t play him at Hooker. He is just not displaying the characteristics of a hooker, his still a halfback his just the stable one not the standout one. I don’t believe there is anything wrong with that.
@bigsiro said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1455449) said:We should have kept Jacob Miller.
@demps said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1454838) said:@tiger5150 said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1454834) said:Oh thank God Demps! I have been waiting for an opportunity to discuss whether Brooks was any good and at a loss where to vent my feelings.
Haha....
I just stumbled upon this.
Compare the comments from then to now
No improvement one could say.
@trusted_insider said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1455435) said:He just needs another few (8) years of development.
@tigerneddyk said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1455484) said:@demps said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1454838) said:@tiger5150 said in [Brooks is no good](/post/1454834) said:Oh thank God Demps! I have been waiting for an opportunity to discuss whether Brooks was any good and at a loss where to vent my feelings.
Haha....
I just stumbled upon this.
Compare the comments from then to now
No improvement one could say.
It’s like being in a time warp…..?
@tigersj said in [Brooks is no good](/post/836130) said:Add to this the coaching over the last two and bit years, did JT do anything to improve his game, I’d say no.
Will Luke turn his career round and show the promise he did as a junior, i hope so. **Lets give a decent coach a chance to work with him (during the off season), a coach that we know can teach a halfback how to play, add to that an improved forward pack, a halves partner that can take some pressure off him and we’ll see what happens.** I can already see that his defence has improved along with his running game.
In regards to all the negative comments about him, why is it always the same posters? unhappy life?