larrycorowa
New member
Thought he was average again tonight. Bombed a try down the right hand side in the first half and cost us a try off a spilt bomb.
Last week against Manly he went right when we would have scored if we went left and was generally pretty unconvincing.
I reckon not having a good fullback has cost us maybe 3-4 games this year.
This might seem trivial but these are the type of things that end up costing you at finals time. We just seem to be losing a couple of lengths to the field if we continue with Tim.
Would a fully fit Mackinnon be a better option at 1 with Moltz back to the bench. Just can't help thinking that Moltz at 1 is going to cost us a big game this year. That said Moltz has more upside than Mackinnon if he starts to fire (but how much pain do we have to take?).
I know we debate this every 3-4 weeks, but for good reason i think. Thoughts?
Last week against Manly he went right when we would have scored if we went left and was generally pretty unconvincing.
I reckon not having a good fullback has cost us maybe 3-4 games this year.
This might seem trivial but these are the type of things that end up costing you at finals time. We just seem to be losing a couple of lengths to the field if we continue with Tim.
Would a fully fit Mackinnon be a better option at 1 with Moltz back to the bench. Just can't help thinking that Moltz at 1 is going to cost us a big game this year. That said Moltz has more upside than Mackinnon if he starts to fire (but how much pain do we have to take?).
I know we debate this every 3-4 weeks, but for good reason i think. Thoughts?